4.5 Article

An Adenoviral Vector Encoding Full-Length Dectin-1 Promotes Aspergillus-Induced Innate Immune Response in Macrophages

期刊

LUNG
卷 193, 期 4, 页码 549-557

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00408-015-9740-8

关键词

Dectin-1; Aspergillus; Adenoviral vector; Innate immune response; Macrophages

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81270064, 81200063]
  2. Nanjing Medical Science and Technology Development Project [YKK13089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction The incidence of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) has increased significantly over the last two decades. Alveolar macrophages (AMs) represent the first line of pulmonary host response to Aspergillus conidia. Recognition of conidia by AMs involves Dectin-1 (CLEC7A), which is a conserved structure to combine beta-glucans. The deficiency of Dectin-1 results in impaired fungal killing and uncontrolled growth of Aspergillus fumigatus. Thus, we hypothesized that high expression of Dectin-1 would enhance the host recognition and fungal killing. Methods We set out to develop an adenoviral vector encoding full-length Dectin-1 (Ad-Dectin-1-EGFP) and then transfect it to MH-S cells. Transfect cell model was verified by using real-time RT-PCR, Western blot, flow cytometric, and confocal microscopic assays. And also, the function of Dectin-1 was explored by measuring cytokine release and killing ability during the course of A. fumigatus infection. Results We constructed a recombinant adenovirus which could upregulate the expression of Dectin-1 and verified that Dectin-1 was expressed on cell membrane. The function of Dectin-1 was also demonstrated by its ability in promoting the production of cytokines and increasing the killing ability during the course of A. fumigatus infection. Conclusions An adenoviral vector was successfully applied to the production of a recombinant adenovirus encoding full-length Dectin-1, and also, its function in Aspergillus-induced innate immune response was demonstrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据