4.6 Article

Feeding by grey seals on endangered stocks of Atlantic cod and white hake

期刊

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 71, 期 6, 页码 1332-1341

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu123

关键词

Atlantic cod; diet; gadoid; grey seal; predation; white hake

资金

  1. Department of Fisheries and Oceans under the CDEENA, Atlantic Seal Research and Laroque Programs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High natural mortality is preventing the recovery of collapsed stocks of Atlantic cod and white hake in the southern Gulf of St Lawrence, Canada. Predation by grey seals has been proposed as an important cause of this high mortality. We determined the contribution of cod and hake to the diet of grey seals collected along the west coast of Cape Breton Island and in the Cabot Strait, an area where overwintering cod aggregate. Along the coast of Cape Breton Island, the contribution of hake and cod to the diet was 30 and 17%, respectively, by weight using stomach contents and 13 and 9%, respectively, based on intestine contents. In the Cabot Strait, when overwintering aggregations of cod were present, cod accounted for 68% (range 57-80%) of the male diet from stomachs, and 46% (range: 31-64%) of the diet determined from intestines. Among females, cod represented 14%(range: 0-34%) and 9%(range: 3-54%) of the diet from stomachs and intestines, respectively. In Cabot Strait, white hake accounted for up to 17% of the diet by weight from stomachs, and up to 6% of the diet determined from intestines. The mean length of cod consumed by seals was 28 cm (SD = 8.6) along the coast of Cape Breton Island, and 39 cm(SD = 5.7) in Cabot Strait. The mean length of hake consumed by seals was 29 cm(SD = 7.0) along the coast of Cape Breton Island, and 35 cm(SD = 5.6) in Cabot Strait. Cod and hake are more important to the diet of males than that of females. The contribution of cod to the diet of grey seals foraging in the cod overwintering area is much greater than has been reported elsewhere.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据