4.6 Article

Mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite genetic differentiation in the European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus L.

期刊

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 69, 期 8, 页码 1357-1371

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fss129

关键词

anchovies; clades; genetic differentiation; microsatellite markers; mitochondrial DNA; multiplex PCR

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [MICINN-08-CIT-600000-2008-16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Borrell, Y. J., Piera, J. A., Sanchez Prado, J. A., and Blanco, G. 2012. Mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite genetic differentiation in the European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus L. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 69: . The European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus is currently one of the principal target species for commercial fisheries in Europe, and most stocks are overfished at present. In this work, specimens were sampled in the Bay of Biscay (Cantabrian, Basque Country, and French coasts) in 2009 and also in the Mediterranean (Adriatic Sea). Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA; cytochrome b and 16S) was sequenced, and 14 nuclear microsatellites showing high and low levels of polymorphism were arranged in three multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems and genotyped. Two main ancient mitochondrial clades were found. These clades are separated by 15 mutational steps and 1.7 sequence divergence, corresponding to a separation time of approximate to 0.5 million years ago. Our results using both mtDNA and microsatellites suggest the presence of at least three genetically differentiated groups: the west Cantabrian Sea, the rest of the populations in the Bay of Biscay, and the Mediterranean. Although it is known that western Iberian Atlantic populations of E. encrasicolus may be genetically different from those of the Bay of Biscay, the results suggest that the transition between these groups may be as close as a 100 km and that a recent genetic homogenization process in the eastward area of the Bay of Biscay has probably occurred.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据