4.5 Article

Physicians' Ability to Predict Patients' Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication in Primary Care

期刊

HYPERTENSION RESEARCH
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 1765-1771

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1291/hypres.31.1765

关键词

hypertension; adherence; compliance; primary care; visual analogue scale

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Addressing adherence to medication Is essential and notoriously difficult. The purpose of this study was to determine physicians' ability to predict patients' adherence to anti hypertensive therapy. Primary care physicians were asked to predict the adherence to medication of their hypertensive patients (n=42) by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at the beginning of the study period. The patients were asked to report their adherence to medication using a VAS. The adherence was then monitored by using a Medical Event Monitoring System (MEMS) for 42 +/- 14 d. The means +/- SD (range) of MEMS measures for timing adherence, correct dosing, and adherence to medication were 82 +/- 27% (0 to 100%), 87 +/- 24% (4 to 100%), and 94 +/- 18% (4 to 108%), respectively. The physicians' prediction of their patients' adherence was 92 +/- 15%. The Spearman rank correlations between the physician's prediction and the MEMS measures of timing adherence, correct dosing, and adherence to medication was 0.42 (p=0.006), 0.47 (p=0.002), and -0.02 (p=0.888), respectively. The patients reported their own adherence to medication at 98 +/- 2% (range 83 to 100%). The Spearman correlations between the reported and actual behaviours were 0.27 (p=0.08) for timing adherence, 0.25 (p=0.12) for correct dosing, and 0.11 (p=0.51) for adherence to medication. The physicians' ability to predict patients' adherence to antihypertensive medication is limited and not accurate for Identifying non-adherent patients in clinical practice. Even patients themselves are unable to give accurate reports of their own adherence to medication. (Hypertens Res 2008; 31: 1765-1771)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据