4.7 Article

Conversion of renal angiotensin II to angiotensin III is critical for AT2 receptor-mediated natriuresis in rats

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 460-465

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.103242

关键词

angiotensin; sodium; natriuresis; angiotensin III; AT(2) receptor; AT(1) receptor

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [T32 DK-07646] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the kidney, angiotensin II (Ang II) is metabolized to angiotensin III (Ang III) by aminopeptidase A (APA). In turn, Ang III is metabolized to angiotensin IV by aminopeptidase N (APN). Renal interstitial (RI) infusion of Ang III, but not Ang II, results in angiotensin type-2 receptor (AT(2)R)-mediated natriuresis. This response is augmented by coinfusion of PC-18, a specific inhibitor of APN. The present study addresses the hypotheses that Ang II conversion to Ang III is critical for the natriuretic response. Sprague-Dawley rats received systemic angiotensin type-1 receptor (AT(1)R) blockade with candesartan (CAND; 0.01 mg/kg/min) for 24 hours before and during the experiment. After a control period, rats received either RI infusion of Ang II or Ang II + PC-18. The contralateral kidney received a RI infusion of vehicle in all rats. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was monitored, and urinary sodium excretion rate (UNaV) was calculated separately from experimental and control kidneys for each period. In contrast to Ang II-infused kidneys, UNaV from Ang II + PC-18-infused kidneys increased from a baseline of 0.03+/-0.01 to 0.09+/-0.02 mu mol/min (P<0.05). MAP was unchanged by either infusion. RI addition of PD-123319, an AT(2)R antagonist, inhibited the natriuretic response. Furthermore, RI addition of EC-33, a selective APA inhibitor, abolished the natriuretic response to Ang II + PC-18. These data demonstrate that RI addition of PC-18 to Ang II enables natriuresis mediated by the AT(2)R, and that conversion of Ang II to Ang III is critical for this response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据