4.6 Article

Application of L-moments and Bayesian inference for low-flow regionalization in Sefidroud basin, Iran

期刊

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 1663-1676

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9711

关键词

low flow; regionalization; L-moments; Bayesian inference; multivariate regression; uncertainty analysis; cluster analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reliable estimation of low flows at ungauged catchments is one of the major challenges in water-resources planning and management. This study aims at providing at-site and ungauged sites low-flow frequency analysis using regionalization approach. A two-stage delineating homogeneous region is proposed in this study. Clustering sites with similar low-flow L-moment ratios is initially conducted, and L-moment-based discordancy and heterogeneity measures are then used to detect unusual sites. Based on the goodness-of-fit test statistic, the best-fit regional model is identified in each hydrologically homogeneous region. The relationship between mean annual 7-day minimum flow and hydro-geomorphic characteristics is also constructed in each homogeneous region associated with the derived regional model for estimating various low-flow quantiles at ungauged sites. Uncertainty analysis of model parameters and low-flow estimations is carried out using the Bayesian inference. Applied in Sefidroud basin located in northwestern Iran, two hydrologically homogeneous regions are identified, i.e. the east and west regions. The best-fit regional model for the east and west regions are generalized logistic and Pearson type III distributions, respectively. The results show that the proposed approach provides reasonably good accuracy for at-site as well as ungauged-site frequency analysis. Besides, interval estimations for model parameters and low flows provide uncertainty information, and the results indicate that Bayesian confidence intervals are significantly reduced when comparing with the outcomes of conventional t-distribution method. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据