4.6 Article

Analysis of best management practice effectiveness and spatiotemporal variability based on different targeting strategies

期刊

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 431-445

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9577

关键词

best management practice; soil and water assessment tool; Saginaw River Watershed; high priority area; targeting methods; spatiotemporal variability

资金

  1. Nature Conservancy [MIFO-121609-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, ten best management practices (BMP) were implemented on agricultural areas in the Saginaw River Watershed using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model based on four targeting methods (Load per Subbasin Area Index (LPSAI), Load per Unit Area Index (LPUAI), Concentration Impact Index (CII), and Load Impact Index (LII)). The effective BMPs both for targeting and non-targeting pollutants were contour farming (CF) (except total nitrogen reduction during total phosphorus targeting scenario), residue management 1000kg/ha and 2000kg/ha, strip cropping, recharge structures, terracing, and native grass (NG). In contrast, conservation tillage and no tillage did not reduce significant amount of pollutants for any combination of targeting methods and priority areas. In regard to spatial correlation between targeting methods, a strong relationship was found between the LPSAI and LPUAI methods both for the sediment and total nitrogen targeting scenarios. In addition, a similar result was found between the CII and LPSAI targeting methods. Regarding the spatiotemporal variability of BMP implementation plan, distinct change in priority area was observed in the case of NG implementation by the end of the secondyear; however, this impact was minimal for CF due to less pollutant reduction efficiency compared to NG. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据