4.5 Article

Characterization of land subsidence induced by groundwater withdrawals in the plain of Beijing city, China

期刊

HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 397-409

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-013-1069-x

关键词

China; Subsidence; Groundwater management; Aquitard; Mechanical behavior

资金

  1. Beijing Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [41201376, 41130744, 41171335]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [8133050, KZ201010028030]
  4. National Basic Research Program (973) of China [2006CB504400]
  5. [BJYRS-ZT-01-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The plain of Beijing city in China suffers severe land subsidence owing to groundwater overdraft. The maximum subsidence rate could reach 6 cm/year through the 2000s. An integrated subsidence-monitoring program was designed, including levelling survey, borehole extensometers and multilayer monitoring of groundwater level, with the aim to understand both hydrological and mechanical processes and to characterize the land subsidence. From multilayer compaction monitoring, the major compression layers were identified. The major strata contributing to compression deformation are the second (64.5-82.3 m) and third (102-117 m) aquitards, which contributed around 39 % of the total subsidence. Meanwhile, irrecoverable deformations were also observed in the second (82.3-102 m) and third (117-148 m) confined aquifers; they exhibit elasto-plastic mechanical behavior, which is attributed to the thin beds of silt or silty clay. Stress-strain analysis and oedometer tests were conducted to study the aquifer-system response to pumpingaEuroEuroand to estimate the specific storage of the major hydrogeologic units. The results reveal the creep behavior and elasto-plastic, visco-elasto-plastic mechanical behavior of the aquitards at different depths. The compressibility of the aquitards in the inelastic range is about one order of magnitude larger than for the elastic range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据