4.6 Article

Effects of structural heterogeneity provided by the floating macrophyte Eichhornia azurea on the predation efficiency and habitat use of the small Neotropical fish Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae

期刊

HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 624, 期 1, 页码 161-170

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-008-9690-8

关键词

Structural heterogeneity; Eichhornia azurea; Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae; Macroinvertebrates; Trophic interactions

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  2. Brazilian Council of Research (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macrophytes have a fundamental structuring role in aquatic environments. Several authors have suggested that trophic interactions are particularly mediated by aquatic plants. In the current article, we evaluated the effects of the structural heterogeneity provided by Eichhornia azurea (Kunth) roots on predation and habitat use by the small fish Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae (Steindachner). We tested the hypotheses that (i) high structural heterogeneity protects macroinvertebrates against predation by M. sanctaefilomenae; (ii) distinct prey types are differently protected by the refuge provided by roots; and (iii) the behavior of M. sanctaefilomenae is affected by the structural heterogeneity provided by macrophyte roots. To test these hypotheses, we performed an experiment in 20 l aquaria in which macroinvertebrates (Cypricercus sp. and Chironomus sp.) were exposed to M. sanctaefilomenae predation for 4 h under three structural heterogeneities, represented by different root densities. High structural heterogeneity protected macroinvertebrates against predation. Additionally, E. azurea roots similarly protected different prey species. The macrophyte spatial structure substantially changed the habitat use of M. sanctaefilomenae. In general, our results corroborated the hypothesis that the structural heterogeneity provided by E. azurea roots significantly affects predation and habitat use by M. sanctaefilomenae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据