期刊
HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 303-313出版社
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der414
关键词
IVF; technology; embryology; embryo selection; safety
资金
- Medical Research Council [G0700092, G0801057, G0300484] Funding Source: Medline
- BBSRC [BB/J021636/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- MRC [G0700092, G0300484, G0801057] Funding Source: UKRI
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J021636/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- Medical Research Council [G0300484, G0801057, G0700092] Funding Source: researchfish
There are many examples in assisted reproduction technology, where new technology and methods have been introduced into the clinical setting without appropriate development and evidence-based medicine to show that the procedure is safe and beneficial to the patient. Examples include preimplantation genetic screening, assisted hatching, in vitro maturation, blastocyst transfer and vitrification. Changes to culture media composition, stimulation regimes and laboratory protocols are also often established internationally without adequate validation. More recently, novel equipment that needs to be validated before it enters routine clinical use is being developed for IVF. With technologies such as producing gametes from stem cells around the corner, it is vital to ensure that the necessary research and development is conducted before bringing new techniques into clinical practice. Ideally, this should include preliminary work on animal models, such as mice/rats/rabbits/larger mammals, followed by studies on human embryos donated for research and finally well-designed RCTs with a follow up of all children born from the procedure. If such preliminary studies are not performed and published, it is possible that technology bringing no clinical benefit or leading to adverse health outcomes in the children born by these practices may be introduced. All IVF clinics need to consider the safety and efficacy of new technologies before introducing them.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据