4.7 Article

Levels of Rabs and WAVE family proteins associated with translocation of GLUT4 to the cell surface in endometria from hyperinsulinemic PCOS women

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 2870-2877

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq232

关键词

endometrium; Rabs; WASP; hyperinsulinemia; GLUT4

资金

  1. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico, Chile (FONDECYT) [1095127]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine-metabolic disorder highly associated with insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinemia. It is known that the insulin signaling pathway is impaired in endometria from PCOS hyperinsulinemic women, but no information is available about molecules associated with cell surface GLUT4 translocation. We therefore evaluated the protein levels of AS160 target molecules, Rab8A and Rab10, and the WAVE family proteins involved in the cortical-actin remodeling, Neural Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein (N-WASP) and WASP, in endometria from hyperinsulinemic PCOS women and controls. Protein levels were assessed by western blot, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence in proliferative (PE = 7) and secretory (SE = 7) phase endometria from control women and in endometria from hyperinsulinemic PCOS women (PCOS h-INS = 7). Similar levels were detected for Rab10 in the three studied groups; however, Rab8A levels decreased in SE (P < 0.05) while higher levels were obtained in PCOSE h-INS compared with PE (P < 0.05). In the normal menstrual cycle, Neural Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP) and WASP levels were increased in SE versus PE (P < 0.05), but in PCOSE h-INS, the levels were diminished compared with PE (P < 0.05). SE is characterized by protein expression changes associated with glucose uptake. In endometria from PCOS women with hyperinsulinemia, reduced levels of WAVE family proteins could compromise the cell surface GLUT4 exposure and the consequent glucose uptake in this tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据