4.1 Article

Factors associated with treatment nonadherence among US bipolar disorder patients

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hup.908

关键词

adherence; adverse effects; bipolar disorder; long-term treatment; prophylaxis; maintenance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Since sustained treatment-adherence is often problematic and may limit clinical outcomes among bipolar disorder (BPD) patients, we sought risk factors to guide clinical prediction of nonadherence. Methods Data were from a 2005 US national sample providing questionnaire responses by 131 randomly selected prescribing psychiatrists and their adult BPD patients. We contrasted demographic and clinical factors in treatment-adherent versus nonadherent patients (strictly defined as missing >= 1 dose within 10 days) in univariate analyses followed by multivariate logistic-regression modeling. Results Of 429 DSM-IV BPD patients (79% type-I; 62% women; 17% minorities), 34% reported missing >= 1 dose of psychotropic medication within 10 days, 20% missed entire daily doses at least once, and only 2.5% missed all doses for 10 days. However, their prescribing psychiatrists considered only 6% as treatment-nonadherent. Factors significantly associated with nonadherence in multivariate modeling ranked: alcohol-dependence > youth > greater affective morbidity > various side effects >= comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder >= recovering from mania-hypomania. Unrelated were sex, diagnostic subtype, and other comorbidities. Since most patients received >= 2 psychotropics, potential relationships between treatment-complexity and adherence were obscured. Conclusions Prevalent treatment-nonadherence among American BPD patients, and striking underestimation of the problem by prescribing clinicians may encourage increasingly complex treatment-regimens of untested value, but added expense, risk of adverse effects, and uncertain impact on treatment-adherence itself. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据