4.5 Article

Position of Glycine Substitutions in the Triple Helix of COL6A1, COL6A2, and COL6A3 is Correlated with Severity and Mode of Inheritance in Collagen VI Myopathies

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 1558-1567

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22429

关键词

collagen VI; Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy; Bethlem myopathy; genotype-phenotype correlation

资金

  1. MDA Clinical Research Training Grant
  2. Primary Children's Medical Center Foundation
  3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  4. National Institutes of Health [5K12HD001410-10]
  5. Muscular Dystrophy Campaign
  6. NIH/NINDS Intramural Research Funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycine substitutions in the conserved Gly-X-Y motif in the triple helical (TH) domain of collagen VI are the most commonly identified mutations in the collagen VI myopathies including Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy, Bethlem myopathy, and intermediate (INT) phenotypes. We describe clinical and genetic characteristics of 97 individuals with glycine substitutions in the TH domain of COL6A1, COL6A2, or COL6A3 and add a review of 97 published cases, for a total of 194 cases. Clinical findings include severe, INT, and mild phenotypes even from patients with identical mutations. INT phenotypes were most common, accounting for almost half of patients, emphasizing the importance of INT phenotypes to the overall phenotypic spectrum. Glycine substitutions in the TH domain are heavily clustered in a short segment N-terminal to the 17th Gly-X-Y triplet, where they are acting as dominants. The most severe cases are clustered in an even smaller region including Gly-X-Y triplets 10-15, accounting for only 5% of the TH domain. Our findings suggest that clustering of glycine substitutions in the N-terminal region of collagen VI is not based on features of the primary sequence. We hypothesize that this region may represent a functional domain within the triple helix.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据