4.5 Article

The long non-coding RNA NEAT1 is elevated in polyglutamine repeat expansion diseases and protects from disease gene-dependent toxicities

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 27, 期 24, 页码 4303-4314

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddy331

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS076631, NS084475]
  2. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyglutamine (polyQ) repeat diseases are a class of neurodegenerative disorders caused by CAG-repeat expansion. There are diverse cellular mechanisms behind the pathogenesis of polyQ disorders, including transcriptional dysregulation. Interestingly, we find that levels of the long isoform of nuclear paraspeckle assembly transcript 1 (Neat1L) are elevated in the brains of mouse models of spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 7 and Huntington's disease (HD). Neat1L was also elevated in differentiated striatal neurons derived from HD knock-in mice and in HD patient brains. The elevation was mutant Huntingtin (mHTT) dependent, as knockdown of mHTT in vitro and in vivo restored Neat1L to normal levels. In additional studies, we found that Neat1L is repressed by methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2) by RNA-protein interaction but not by occupancy of MeCP2 at its promoter. We also found that NEAT1L overexpression protects from mHTT-induced cytotoxicity, while reducing it enhanced mHTT-dependent toxicity. Gene set enrichment analysis of previously published RNA sequencing data from mouse embryonic fibroblasts and cells derived from HD patients shows that loss of NEAT1L impairs multiple cellular functions, including pathways involved in cell proliferation and development. Intriguingly, the genes dysregulated in HD human brain samples overlap with pathways affected by a reduction in NEAT1, confirming the correlation of NEAT1L and HD-induced perturbations. Cumulatively, the role of NEAT1L in polyQ disease model systems and human tissues suggests that it may play a protective role in CAG-repeat expansion diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据