4.5 Article

Fetal inhibition of inflammation improves disease phenotypes in harlequin ichthyosis

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 436-449

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu459

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) [1020281, 1012353, 1043845]
  2. Independent Research Institutes Infrastructure Support Scheme Grant [361646]
  3. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program
  4. Australian Post-graduate Award
  5. Monash International Post-graduate Research Scholarship
  6. Monash Graduate Scholarship
  7. Australian Research Council Australian Research Fellowship
  8. Sylvia and Charles Viertel Foundation
  9. Monash University
  10. National Health and Medical Research Council [384457]
  11. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT100100620]
  12. [461219]
  13. [1016647]
  14. Australian Research Council [FT100100620] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Harlequin ichthyosis (HI) is a severe skin disease which leads to neonatal death in similar to 50% of cases. It is the result of mutations in ABCA12, a protein that transports lipids required to establish the protective skin barrier needed after birth. To better understand the life-threatening newborn HI phenotype, we analysed the developing epidermis for consequences of lipid dysregulation in mouse models. We observed a pro-inflammatory signature which was characterized by chemokine upregulation in embryonic skin which is distinct from that seen in other types of ichthyosis. Inflammation also persisted in grafted HI skin. To examine the contribution of inflammation to disease development, we overexpressed interleukin-37b to globally suppress fetal inflammation, observing considerable improvements in keratinocyte differentiation. These studies highlight inflammation as an unexpected contributor to HI disease development in utero, and suggest that inhibiting inflammation may reduce disease severity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据