4.5 Article

Mutations in the FOG2/ZFPM2 gene are associated with anomalies of human testis determination

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 23, 期 14, 页码 3657-3665

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu074

关键词

-

资金

  1. Laboratoire Lilly France
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche-GIS Institut des Maladies Rares
  3. March of Dimes Foundation Research Grant [1-FY07-490]
  4. EuroDSD in the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme FP7 [201444]
  5. Projet Blanc Institut Pasteur/Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris [295097]
  6. GM_NCD_in_Co-Reinforcing IPT capacities in Genomic Medicine, Non Communicable Diseases Investigation and international cooperation as part of the EU [FP7-INCO-2011-6]
  7. Actions concertees Inter-Pasteuriennes [ACIP A16-2013]
  8. Franco-Egyptian AIRD-STDF grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, considerable advances have been made in our understanding of genetics of mammalian gonad development; however, the underlying genetic aetiology in the majority of patients with 46,XY disorders of sex development (DSD) still remains unknown. Based on mouse models, it has been hypothesized that haploinsufficiency of the Friend of GATA 2 (FOG2) gene could lead to 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis on specific inbred genetic backgrounds. Using whole exome sequencing, we identified independent missense mutations in FOG2 in two patients with 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis. One patient carried a non-synonymous heterozygous mutation (p.S402R), while the other patient carried a heterozygous p.R260Q mutation and a homozygous p.M544I mutation. Functional studies indicated that the failure of testis development in these cases could be explained by the impaired ability of the mutant FOG2 proteins to interact with a known regulator of early testis development, GATA4. This is the first example of mutations in the coding sequence of FOG2 associated with 46,XY DSD in human and adds to the list of genes in the human known to be associated with DSD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据