4.5 Article

Phenotype-specific effect of chromosome 1q21.1 rearrangements and GJA5 duplications in 2436 congenital heart disease patients and 6760 controls

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 1513-1520

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddr589

关键词

-

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation (BHF)
  2. European Community
  3. Heart Research UK
  4. Federated Foundation
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. British Heart Foundation [RG/08/012/25941, RG/07/010/23676, RG/10/17/28553, PG/07/045/22690] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recurrent rearrangements of chromosome 1q21.1 that occur via non-allelic homologous recombination have been associated with variable phenotypes exhibiting incomplete penetrance, including congenital heart disease (CHD). However, the gene or genes within the approximate to 1 Mb critical region responsible for each of the associated phenotypes remains unknown. We examined the 1q21.1 locus in 948 patients with tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), 1488 patients with other forms of CHD and 6760 ethnically matched controls using single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping arrays (Illumina 660W and Affymetrix 6.0) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. We found that duplication of 1q21.1 was more common in cases of TOF than in controls [odds ratio (OR) 30.9, 95 confidence interval (CI) 8.9107.6); P 2.2 10(7)], but deletion was not. In contrast, deletion of 1q21.1 was more common in cases of non-TOF CHD than in controls [OR 5.5 (95 CI 1.422.0); P 0.04] while duplication was not. We also detected rare (n 3) 100200 kb duplications within the critical region of 1q21.1 in cases of TOF. These small duplications encompassed a single gene in common, GJA5, and were enriched in cases of TOF in comparison to controls [OR 10.7 (95 CI 1.864.3), P 0.01]. These findings show that duplication and deletion at chromosome 1q21.1 exhibit a degree of phenotypic specificity in CHD, and implicate GJA5 as the gene responsible for the CHD phenotypes observed with copy number imbalances at this locus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据