4.5 Article

Silencing of multi-copy HPV16 by viral self-methylation and chromatin occlusion: a model for epigenetic virushost interaction

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 1693-1705

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddr604

关键词

-

资金

  1. DKFZ-Canceropole du Grande Est cooperation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, we used the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16)-positive cervical carcinoma cell line CaSki as a paradigmatic model to understand epigenetic silencing of viral multi-copy genomes. We show that most of the hypermethylated HPV16 copies are kept as ooccluded' chromatin that defines a condition where genes were refractory in their response to trans-acting transcription factors and to external reactivation efforts. This provides the first example that viral genomes are silenced by such a host cell mechanism, hitherto only known for endogenous genes to preserve a stable and robust phenotype. Moreover, considering an adaptive cross-talk between viral proteins and the epigenetic modification machinery, we demonstrate that particularly E2but also ectopically delivered E6/E7can induce significant de novo methylation within the enhancer and, to a less extent, within the promoter region. These data suggest that under certain physiological conditions, HPV can down-regulate its own gene expression, regardless of the presence of transcriptional activators. We propose that self-methylation of multi-copy HPV could be the first event prior to heterochromatin formation. These processes favour an ooccluded' chromatin conformation, finally being unresponsive to transcriptional activation. The shift from potentially competent heterochromatin towards an occluded state is basically irreversible, possibly using the same mechanism described for lineage differentiation. Along this line, it is tempting to speculate that viruscell interaction is able to osense' viral copy number and down-regulates excess of gene activity in order to guarantee cell viability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据