4.5 Article

Identification of epistatic effects using a protein-protein interaction database

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 19, 期 22, 页码 4345-4352

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddq356

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [HL100245, NS041558]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epistasis (i.e. gene-gene interaction) has long been recognized as an important mechanism underlying the complexity of the genetic architecture of human traits. Definitions of epistasis range from the purely molecular to the traditional statistical measures of interaction. The statistical detection of epistasis usually does not map onto or easily relate to the biological interactions between genetic variations through their combined influence on gene expression or through their interactions at the gene product (i.e. protein) or DNA level. Recently, greater high-dimensional data on protein-protein interaction (PPI) and gene expression profiles have been collected that enumerates sets of biological interactions. To better align statistical and molecular models of epistasis, we present an example of how to incorporate the PPI information into the statistical analysis of interactions between copy number variations (CNVs). Among the 23 640 pairs of known human PPIs and the 1141 common CNVs detected among HapMap samples, we identified 37 pairs of CNVs overlapping with both genes of a PPI pair. Two CNV pairs provided sufficient genotype variation to search for epistatic effects on gene expression. Using 47 294 probe-specific gene expression levels as the outcomes, five epistatic effects were identified with P-value less than 10(-6). We found a CNV-CNV interaction significantly associated with gene expression of TP53TG3 (P-value of 2 3 10(-20)). The proteins associated with the CNV pair also bind TP53 which regulates the transcription of TP53TG3. This study demonstrates that using PPI data can assist in targeting statistical hypothesis testing to biological plausible epistatic interaction that reflects molecular mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据