4.5 Article

Pooled analysis of genetic variation at chromosome 8q24 and colorectal neoplasia risk

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 17, 期 17, 页码 2665-2672

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddn166

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics
  2. National Cancer Institute
  3. National Institutes of Health [N01-CO-12400, CA87969, CA55075, CA059045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several different genetic variants at chromosome 8q24 have been related to prostate, breast and colorectal cancer risk with evidence of region-specific risk differentials for various tumor types. We investigated the association between 15 polymorphisms located in 8q24 regions associated with cancer risk in a pooled analysis of 2587 colorectal adenoma cases, 547 colorectal cancer cases and 2798 controls of European descent from four studies. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the associations. Three polymorphisms (rs10808555, rs6983267 and rs7837328) located between 128.47 and 128.54 Mb were found to be associated with colorectal tumor risk. The association was strongest for the previously reported rs6983267 variant and was similar for both adenoma (ORper allele = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.07-1.25, P = 0.0002) and cancer (ORper allele = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01-1.35, P = 0.03). The strength of the association of the regional haplotype containing variant alleles at rs10808555, rs6983267 and rs7837328 but not rs10505476 was greater than that of any single variant of both adenoma (OR = 1.27, P = 0.0001) and cancer (OR = 1.26, P = 0.03). The risk associated with rs6983267 was stronger for multiple adenomas (ORper allele = 1.29, P = 5.6 x 10(-6)) than for single adenoma (ORper allele = 1.10, P = 0.03) with P-heterogeneity = 0.008. This study confirms the association between colorectal neoplasia and the 8q24 polymorphisms located between 128.47 and 128.54 Mb and suggests a role for these variants in the formation of multiple adenomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据