4.2 Article

Meta-analysis reveals an association of STAT4 polymorphisms with systemic autoimmune disorders and anti-dsDNA antibody

期刊

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 74, 期 8, 页码 986-992

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2013.04.034

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical College of Xiamen University
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [EXC 306/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 4 (STAT4) has been recently identified as a susceptibility gene for multiple autoimmune diseases. Here we performed a comprehensive analysis of the association between STAT4 and several different autoimmune disorders to identify potential common inflammatory principles behind this association. Our meta-analysis revealed that the STAT4 rs7574865 polymorphism is associated with four autoimmune diseases with systemic pathology, including systemic lupus erythematosus (OR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.48-1.56, P < 1.0 x 10(-16)), rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.21-1.33, P < 1.00 x 10(-16)), systemic sclerosis (OR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.27-1.50, P < 1.44 x 10(-14)), and primary Sjogren's syndrome (OR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.01-1.73, P = 4.40 x 10(-2)), while no association was found with type I diabetes, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Furthermore, the stratified meta-analysis also demonstrate that the STAT4 rs7574865 polymorphism is associated with the presence of autoantibodies with systemic reactivity (anti-ds-DNA antibodies) in SLE patients (OR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.21-1.56, P = 1.12 x 10(-6)). However, no such specific association was seen in RA with regard to the presence of non-systemically reacting antibodies, including rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies. Taken together, these results suggest that STAT4 polymorphisms are associated with autoimmune diseases which are characterized by a systemic pathology and anti-dsDNA antibody. (C) 2013 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据