4.2 Article

CCR2 and CCR5 genes polymorphisms in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate

期刊

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 74, 期 8, 页码 1003-1008

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2013.04.031

关键词

-

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico CNPq [306349/2011-6, 135450/2009-8, 473115/2011-5]
  2. Fundo do Incentivo a Pesquisa e Eventos/Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre FIPE/HCPA [07-533]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul FAPERGS [10/1516-6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) are two chronic conditions, very common in aged men, that have been associated to inflammatory process. Chemokines and their receptors are recognized as critical mediators of inflammatory responses, they regulate immune cell migration and are implicated in tumor pathogenesis. The impact of two chemokine receptor gene polymorphisms, CCR2-64I (rs1799864) and CCR5-Delta 32 (rs333), was evaluated in BPH and PCa. 385 DNA samples (130 BPH, 136 PCa, 119 healthy control) were genotyped. The allele frequencies were similar among control, BPH and PCa groups. Median of serum PSA levels was different between groups: 0.79, 1.45 and 6.91 ng/mL in control, BPH and PCa groups, respectively (all p < 0.001). The prostate volume median was 20.00 cm(3) in the control group, thus, lower than BPH (35.35 cm(3)) and PCa (35.80 cm(3)) (both p < 0.001), nevertheless no statistical significant difference was observed between BPH and PCa patients (p = 0.172). Remarkably, CCR2-64I was a protective factor to PCa when compared with BPH (OR = 0.550; 95%CI = 0.311-0.975), although the statistically significant difference was lost after correction for multiple comparisons. No significant associations of CCR5-Delta 32 variant were observed with BPH, PCa or PCa clinicopathologic status. Our data suggest the influence of CCR2-64I variant in the development of prostate cancer. (C) 2013 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据