4.2 Article

Altered Chemokine Th1/Th2 Balance in Addison's Disease: Relationship with Hydrocortisone Dosing and Quality of Life

期刊

HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 48-53

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1351291

关键词

adrenocortical insufficiency; cortisol; chemokines; autoimmunity

资金

  1. Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden [04952]
  2. Linkoping University, Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adrenalitis found in autoimmune Addison's disease (AAD) is considered having a Th1-driven pathogenesis. Circulating Th1- and Th2-associated chemokines responsible for the trafficking of leukocytes to inflammatory sites are markers for the Th1/Th2 balance. The aim of the study was to assess if the same daily hydrocortisone dose of 30mg given in either 2 or 4 doses to patients with AAD could affect the Th1/Th2 balance of circulating chemokines. Fifteen patients (6 women) with AAD were included in this randomised, placebo controlled, double blind cross-over study. Samples for chemokines, Th1-associated (CXCL10, CXCL11) and Th2-associated (CCL17, CCL22), were drawn 5 times during a 24-h period at the end of each treatment period and analysed with Luminex. Seven control subjects did the same diurnal blood sampling once. Subjects with AAD had higher median diurnal levels of the Th1-associated chemokines than controls, CXCL10 [43 (33-56) pg/ml vs. 22 (19-34) pg/ml, p<0.01] and CXCL11 [37 (29-48) pg/ml vs. 16 (9-24) pg/ml, p<0.001], whereas no significant difference was found regarding the Th2-related chemokines. Similar chemokine levels were found when the same hydrocortisone dose of 30mg was divided in 2 or 4 doses. Levels of CXCL11 correlated negatively with scores of SF-36 domains (high score indicate better health) of General Health (GH) and total score for Physical Component Summary (PCS), and these negative correlations were most pronounced at 04:00h on the 2-dose regimen. Patients with AAD have a dominant Th1 chemokine profile that partially correlates to reduced quality of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据