4.6 Article

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of advanced colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma

期刊

HISTOPATHOLOGY
卷 61, 期 2, 页码 162-169

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04235.x

关键词

growth pattern; mucinous adenocarcinoma; prognostic factor

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Yamaguchi T, Taniguchi H, Fujita S, Sekine S, Yamamoto S, Akasu T, Kushima R, Tani T, Moriya Y & Shimoda T ?(2012) Histopathology similar to 61, 162169 Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of advanced colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma Aims: Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MUC) is a histological variant of colorectal adenocarcinoma. The aim of the present study was to characterize clinicopathological features and identify prognostic factors of MUCs. Methods and results: A total of 181 patients with MUC who underwent surgery between 1975 and 2003 were reviewed. The clinicopathological features of these patients were compared with those of 4125 non-MUC patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify significant prognostic factors in 102 patients with pT3 or pT4 tumour who underwent curative surgery. Patients with MUCs tended to present with more advanced clinical stages. The overall 5-year survival rate of MUC patients was lower than that of non-MUC patients; however, no prognostic difference was found when patients with the same clinical stages were compared. Multivariate analysis revealed male sex, bowel obstruction and infiltrating growth type as independent prognostic factors. Five-year cancer-specific survival rates for MUC patients with =1, 2 and 3 risk factors identified by multivariate analysis were 95.5%, 52.1% and 0.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Mucinous adenocarcinoma represents a distinct clinicopathological entity. Sex, bowel obstruction and growth patterns might be useful prognostic factors to identify patients with a high risk of recurrence after curative resection of advanced MUCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据