4.6 Article

Expression of classical NF-κB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma

期刊

HISTOPATHOLOGY
卷 56, 期 6, 页码 727-739

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03544.x

关键词

classical NF-kappa B pathway; ovarian cancer; prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Functional studies have demonstrated that nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B promotes tumour progression in ovarian cancer cells. However, surprisingly little is known of the expression of effectors of the NF-kappa B pathway in human ovarian cancer in vivo. Methods and results: Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization revealed that in a cohort of 85 primary ovarian carcinomas, total p65 expression was inversely correlated to nuclear and cytoplasmic phospho-I kappa B alpha (P = 0.002 and P = 0.05, respectively), and I kappa B alpha mRNA expression (P = 0.032). In contrast, phospho-p65 expression was paralleled by the expression of nuclear (P = 0.027) and cytoplasmic phospho-I kappa B alpha (P = 0.01). Total p65 expression was an adverse prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.018). In contrast, total I kappa B alpha and phosphorylated nuclear and cytoplasmic I kappa B alpha expression were favourable prognostic markers (P = 0.001, P = 0.031, P = 0.001, respectively). Cytoplasmic phospho-I kappa B alpha expression remained a significant prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (P = 0.010). In cultured, stimulated OVCAR-3 ovarian cancer cells the cytoplasmic retranslocation of p65 was delayed by inhibition of the nuclear membrane transporter chromosomal region maintenance/exportin1 protein (CRM1). A positive association of p65 and CRM1 expression was demonstrated in ovarian cancer tissue (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Total and phosphorylated I kappa B alpha protein expression might serve as markers for NF-kappa B activation in human ovarian carcinoma. Cytoplasmic localization of p65 may be related to deregulated nucleocytoplasmic transport in carcinomas overexpressing CRM1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据