4.6 Article

Overexpression of RAD51 occurs in aggressive prostatic cancer

期刊

HISTOPATHOLOGY
卷 55, 期 6, 页码 696-704

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03448.x

关键词

BRCA1 and BRCA1 mutation carriers; prostatic cancer; RAD51 immunohistochemistry

资金

  1. Ronald and Rita McAulay Foundation
  2. CR-UK [C5047/A8385]
  3. Biomedical Research Centre NIHR
  4. North West Cancer Research Fund [CR809]
  5. Cancer Research UK [10118, 11022] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overexpression of RAD51 occurs in aggressive prostatic cancer Aims: To test the hypothesis that, in a matched series of prostatic cancers, either with or without BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, RAD51 protein expression is enhanced in association with BRCA mutation genotypes. Methods and results: RAD51 expression identified immunohistochemically was compared between prostatic cancers occurring in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers and controls. RAD51 protein expression in the cytoplasm and nuclei of the benign tissues was significantly less than in the malignant tissues (P < 0.001). In all cancers, cytoplasmic expression of RAD51 was more prevalent and associated with higher Gleason score (P < 0.05) irrespective of BRCA mutational status, than its expression in benign tissues (P < 0.001). Although nuclear immunoreactivity was not observed in BRCA-associated cancers with Gleason score < 7, it was significantly increased in all other groups of prostatic cancers when compared with benign tissues (P < 0.001). Conclusions: RAD51 protein is strongly expressed in high-grade prostatic cancers, whether sporadic or associated with BRCA germ-line mutations. Distinct localization of RAD51 between cytoplasm and nucleus, particularly in cancers of Gleason score < 7, reflects distinct levels of RAD51 regulatory activity, from transcription to DNA repair. This biomarker may be of value in identifying patients requiring urgent treatment at diagnosis as well as in analysing biological mechanisms underlying aggressive phenotype of human prostatic cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据