4.3 Article

Developmental profile of SK2 channel expression and function in CA1 neurons

期刊

HIPPOCAMPUS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 1467-1480

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20986

关键词

potassium channel; electron microscopy; development; calcium channels

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [BFU-2009-08404/BFI, CONSOLIDER-CSD2008-00005]
  2. Consejeria de Educacion y Ciencia, Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha [PAI08-0174-6967]
  3. NIH [NS038880, MH081860-01]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21500311] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the temporal and spatial expression of SK2 in the developing mouse hippocampus using molecular and biochemical techniques, quantitative immunogold electron microscopy, and electrophysiology. The mRNA encoding SK2 was expressed in the developing and adult hippocampus. Western blotting and immunohistochemistry showed that SK2 protein increased with age. This was accompanied by a shift in subcellular localization. Early in development (P5), SK2 was predominantly localized to the endoplasmic reticulum in the pyramidal cell layer. But by P30 SK2 was almost exclusively expressed in the dendrites and spines. The level of SK2 at the postsynaptic density (PSD) also increased during development. In the adult, SK2 expression on the spine plasma membrane showed a proximal-to-distal gradient. Consistent with this redistribution and gradient of SK2, the selective SK channel blocker apamin increased evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) only in CA1 pyramidal neurons from mice older than P15. However, the effect of apamin on EPSPs was not different between synapses in proximal or distal stratum radiatum or stratum lacunosum-moleculare in adult. These results show a developmental increase and gradient in SK2-containing channel surface expression that underlie their influence on neurotransmission, and that may contribute to increased memory acquisition during early development. 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据