4.3 Article

Effect of Corticosterone on Developing Hippocampus: Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes

期刊

HIPPOCAMPUS
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 338-349

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20523

关键词

glucocorticoid; development; learning and memory; adrenalectomy; infant mice

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) [2004CB518906]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) [IRT0514]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [30572342]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many documents implicate that corticosterone plays a negative role in brain function, especially in learning and memory. However, less evidence confirms its direct actions on hippocampal development. In the work reported here, pro treatment, minimum corticosterone administration in infant mice, and con treatment, corticosterone deprivation by adrenalectomy, were used to examine the effects imposed by corticosterone on the structure and function of developing hippocampus. Our study shows that adrenalectomy induces decrease of plasma corticosterone levels and results in the impairment of learning performance and the degenerative changes not in CA regions of hippocampus but in dentate gyrus. Noteworthily, this damage effect is severer in 5-week-old mice than that in 10-week-old mice. In addition, the short-term effect of minimum corticosterone administration may accelerate the development of dentate gyrus of 10-day-old mice. Moreover, minimum corticosterone administration during infancy contributed to the learning performance and the structural integrity of hippocampal CA regions in different developing stages, while this phenomenon was not observed in dentate gyrus. In conclusion, corticosterone is necessary for the development of dentate gyros, especially in relatively young individuals, and administration with minimum corticosterone in infancy has a long-term positive influence on the hippocampal structure and function in different developing stages. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据