4.2 Article

A Variant of the Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene (NOS3) Associated with AMS Susceptibility Is Less Common in the Quechua, a High Altitude Native Population

期刊

HIGH ALTITUDE MEDICINE & BIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 27-30

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ham.2009.1054

关键词

altitude illness; acute mountain sickness; nitric oxide; nitric oxide synthase; Quechua; Maya

资金

  1. UBC University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wang, Pei, Alice Y. N. Ha, Kenneth K. Kidd, Michael S. Koehle, and Jim L. Rupert. A variant of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene (NOS3) associated with AMS susceptibility is less common in the Quechua, a high altitude native population. High Alt. Med. Biol. 20:27-30, 2010. - Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is a vascular enzyme that produces nitric oxide, a transient signaling molecule that by vasodilatation regulates blood flow and pressure. Nitric oxide is believed to play roles in both short-term acclimatization and long-term evolutionary adaptation to environmental hypoxia. Several laboratories, including ours, have shown that variants in NOS3 (the gene encoding eNOS) are overrepresented in individuals with altitude-related illnesses such as high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) and acute mountain sickness (AMS), suggesting that NOS3 genotypes contribute to altitude tolerance. To further test our hypothesis that the G allele at the G894T polymorphism in NOS3 (dbSNP number: rs1799983; protein polymorphism Glu298Asp) is beneficial in hypoxic environments, we compared frequencies of this allele in an altitude-adapted Amerindian population, Quechua of the Andean altiplano, with those in a lowland Amerindian population, Maya of the Yucatan Peninsula. While common in both populations, the G allele was significantly more frequent in the highlanders. Taken together, our data suggest that this variant in NOS3, which has been previously associated with higher levels of nitric oxide, contributes to both acclimatization and adaptation to altitude.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据