4.7 Article

Evaluating management strategies to enhance biodiversity in conservation developments: Perspectives from developers in Colorado, USA

期刊

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 87-96

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.002

关键词

Urban ecology; Conservation development; Colorado; Biodiversity; Open space; Rural land use planning

资金

  1. Conservation Development Global Challenges Research Team at Colorado State University
  2. University of Florida Graduate Student Council [2117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conservation development (CD) refers to a set of land development techniques aimed at minimizing impacts on natural resources. Typically, homes are clustered and open space is set aside for conservation. The evidence for the effectiveness of CDs in conserving biodiversity is mixed, with some studies attributing these results to a lack of stewardship in conserved areas. The purpose of this research was to ask landowners and developers to evaluate which conservation practices, as part of a policy scenario, would be most acceptable. We surveyed landowners and developers who had created CDs in north-central Colorado; we solicited their attitudes about native wildlife conservation and willingness to adopt four conservation practices, given proposed incentive-based policies. We also conducted semi-structured interviews with respondents to elaborate on their response to these proposed incentives, as well as two potential funding mechanisms for managing the open space for biodiversity (homeowners' association dues and a property tax). Overall, we found moderate support for the conservation practices, some interest in two types of incentives (a housing density bonus and fast-tracking permits), and opposition to the two proposed funding mechanisms for land stewardship. Our findings suggest that CD developers in Colorado would be willing to adopt conservation practices, and are generally supportive of incentive-based policies, but greater understanding of homeowners' willingness to pay for conservation features is needed to gain support for a funding mechanism. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据