4.3 Article

Within-population variation in free-living adult and ectoparasitic larval trombiculid mites on collared lizards

期刊

HERPETOLOGICA
卷 64, 期 2, 页码 189-199

出版社

HERPETOLOGISTS LEAGUE
DOI: 10.1655/07-052.1

关键词

costs of parasitism; growth rate; host-parasite interactions; lizard ectoparasites; Trombiculidae

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We quantified within-population variation in the seasonal abundance of free-living adult trombiculid mites and infestation of collared lizards by parasitic mite larvae at the Arcadia Lake Dam in Edmond, OK, U.S.A. Lizards oil one of two habitat patches (front) harbored many more larval mites, and were more rapidly re-infested after mites were removed experimentally. Although female and male lizards and males displaying alternative social tactics had different activity rates, they harbored similar numbers of parasites, which is inconsistent with the hypothesis that the degree of ectoparasitism is positively related to host activity. Heavy mite infestation of front patch lizards was related to greater exposure to vegetation/soil surrounding this habitat patch, and perhaps more favorable physical conditions there for mite reproduction and development. The abundance of free-living adult mites on the rock substrata occupied by collared lizards was temporally dissociated from infestation of lizards by mite larvae. Free-living adult mites were abundant in May, but demand precipitously in June shortly after larvae began to appear oil lizards. Larval parasites remained until lizards entered hibernacula in late summer. There was no effect of marked differences ill larval mite load oil any of the behavioral, and most of the life-historical variables that we measured. The exception was growth rate. First-year males grow faster than all), of the other social classes in this population, and their rates were reduced oil the front habitat patch suggesting a growth cost of heavy parasitism at a time when lizards exhibit maximal growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据