4.8 Article

Different Biochemical Correlates for Different Neuropsychiatric Abnormalities in Patients With Cirrhosis

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 558-566

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hep.24043

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) relies on clinical, neurophysiological, psychometric and laboratory variables. The relationships between such tests remain debated. The aim of this study was to determine the laboratory correlates/prognostic value of neurophysiological/psychometric abnormalities in patients with cirrhosis. Seventy-two patients and 14 healthy volunteers underwent EEG and paper-and-pencil psychometry (PHES). Blood was obtained for C reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL6), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)alpha, ammonia and indole/oxindole. Patients were followed prospectively for a median of 22 months in relation to the occurrence of death, transplantation and HE-related hospitalizations. Thirty-three patients had normal PHES and EEG, 6 had abnormal PHES, 18 abnormal EEG and 13 abnormal PHES and EEG. Patients with abnormal PHES had higher CRP (17 +/- 22 vs 7 +/- 6, P < 0.01), IL6 (32 +/- 54 vs 12 +/- 13, P < 0.05) and TNF alpha (17 +/- 8 vs 11 +/- 7, P < 0.001) levels than those with normal PHES. Patients with abnormal EEG had higher indole (430 270 vs 258 255, P < 0.01) and ammonia (66 35 vs 45 27, P < 0.05) levels than those with normal EEG. Psychometric test scores showed significant correlations with CRP, TNFa and IL6; EEG indices with ammonia and IL6. CRP and TNF alpha concentrations were independent predictors of abnormal PHES, ammonia and indole of abnormal EEG on multivariate analysis. Seven patients were lost to follow-up; of the remaining 65, 20 died and 14 underwent transplantation; 15 developed HE requiring hospitalization. PHES and EEG performance were independent predictors of HE and death (P < 0.05). Conclusion: PHES and EEG abnormalities in patients with cirrhosis have partially different biochemical correlates and independently predict outcome. (HEPATOLOGY 2011;53:558-566)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据