4.4 Article

Electrocardiographic characteristics of ventricular arrhythmias originating from the junction of the left and right coronary sinuses of valsalva in the aorta: The activation pattern as a rationale for the electrocardiographic characteristics

期刊

HEART RHYTHM
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 184-192

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.09.029

关键词

aortic sinus cusp; ventricular arrhythmia; electroanatomic mapping; radiofrequency catheter ablation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) may arise from the aortic sinuses and have electrocardiographic and electrophysiological characteristics that suggest a Left (LCC) or right coronary cusp (RCC) origin. However, VAs that arise near the junction of those two cusps (L-RCC) may have unusual features. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to examine the electrocardiographic and electrophysiological characteristics of VAs arising from the L-RCC. METHODS We studied 155 patients with idiopathic VAs with either Left or right bundle branch block and an inferior QRS axis morphology and five control subjects undergoing a pacing study. RESULTS For 146 of the 155 patients, the origin determined by the successful ablation site was at the L-RCC in five, LCC in 13, RCC in six, non-coronary cusp in two, right ventricular outflow tract in 108, left ventricular outflow tract in five, left ventricular epicardium in four, and pulmonary artery in three. A qrS pattern in Leads V1-V3 was observed only in the VAs with an L-RCC origin. The propagation map revealed that the direction of the propagating wave front from the L-RCC origin produced a vector compatible with a q wave and that the anterior activation to the right ventricular outflow tract via the LCC or RCC formed the r wave. Pacing performed at multiple sites in the aortic root in the control subjects demonstrated that only pacing from the L-RCC could reproduce a qrS pattern in leads V1-V3. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that a qrS pattern in leads V1-V3 suggests a site of origin at the L-RCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据