4.7 Article

High-throughput mapping of brain-wide activity in awake and drug-responsive vertebrates

期刊

LAB ON A CHIP
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 680-689

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4lc01186d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81201164]
  2. University Grants Council of Hong Kong [ECS125012, GRF11211314]
  3. Innovation and Technology Commission of Hong Kong [ITF3 ITS/376/13]
  4. City University of Hong Kong [7200269, 9610215, 9667077, 7003022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reconstruction of neural activity across complete neural circuits, or brain activity mapping, has great potential in both fundamental and translational neuroscience research. Larval zebrafish, a vertebrate model, has recently been demonstrated to be amenable to whole brain activity mapping in behaving animals. Here we demonstrate a microfluidic array system (Fish-Trap) that enables high-throughput mapping of brain-wide activity in awake larval zebrafish. Unlike the commonly practiced larva-processing methods using a rigid gel or a capillary tube, which are laborious and time-consuming, the hydrodynamic design of our microfluidic chip allows automatic, gel-free, and anesthetic-free processing of tens of larvae for microscopic imaging with single-cell resolution. Notably, this system provides the capability to directly couple pharmaceutical stimuli with real-time recording of neural activity in a large number of animals, and the local and global effects of pharmacoactive drugs on the nervous system can be directly visualized and evaluated by analyzing drug-induced functional perturbation within or across different brain regions. Using this technology, we tested a set of neurotoxin peptides and obtained new insights into how to exploit neurotoxin derivatives as therapeutic agents. The novel and versatile Fish-Trap technology can be readily unitized to study other stimulus (optical, acoustic, or physical) associated functional brain circuits using similar experimental strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据