4.5 Article

Effects of deafening and cochlear implantation procedures on postimplantation psychophysical electrical detection thresholds

期刊

HEARING RESEARCH
卷 241, 期 1-2, 页码 64-72

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.011

关键词

cochlear implant; electrical detection threshold; neomycin deafening; animal psychophysics; impedance; guinea pig

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC004312-08, P30 DC005188-06, P30 DC05188, R01 DC007634-03, R01 DC003389-08, R01-DC03389, R01-DC007634, R01 DC003389, R01 DC007634, P30 DC005188, R01 DC004312, R01-DC04312] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have shown large decreases in cochlear implant psychophysical detection thresholds during the weeks following the onset of electrical testing. The current study sought to determine the variables underlying these threshold decreases by examining the effects of four deafening and implantation procedures on detection thresholds and implant impedances. Thirty-two guinea pigs were divided into four matched groups. Group I was deafened and implanted Day 0 and began electrical testing Day 1. Group 11 was deafened and implanted Day 0 and began electrical testing Day 45. Group III was deafened Day 0, implanted Day 45 and began electrical testing Day 46. Group IV was not predeafened but was implanted Day 0 and began electrical testing Day 1. All groups showed threshold decreases over time but the magnitude of change, time course and final stable threshold levels depended on the type and time course of treatment. Impedances increased over the first two weeks following the onset of electrical testing except in Group II. Results suggest that multiple mechanisms underlie the observed threshold shifts including (1) recovery of the cochlea from a temporary pathology caused by the deafening and/or implantation procedures, (2) effects of electrical stimulation on the auditory pathway, and (3) tissue growth in the implanted cochlea. They also suggest that surviving hair cells influence electrical threshold levels. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据