拉文哈尔德 2021-12-02

Submitted on August 16th, after about 20 days, I received major revisions from three reviewers. After supplementing with repeated experiments for about one and a half months, I returned the revised manuscript in early October. During this period, the editorial department requested two reformatting revisions for the format and image format colors. On December 1st, I received the acceptance notification. Overall, the efficiency was quite high. This journal has strict formatting requirements, and the reviewers' comments are in line with the research direction and content.

muzi 2021-10-26

Translation: Article status: Awaiting revision

muzi 2021-10-26

Hello, what does this status mean? Thank you.

蜂鸟_7 2021-10-21

Submitted on April 24th, assigned to academic editor on May 4th, major revision comments returned on July 30th. Revised on October 4th. Reviewed again on October 7th. Currently, there is no result and it has been half a year. If you are in a hurry to graduate, really do not submit to this journal.

大豆乖 2021-10-19

2021.6.24 Submission
7.8 Magazine editor review (format and data, etc.) (delayed for a period of time due to data upload issue)
8.11 External review
8.23 Assignment of academic editor
9.21 Minor revisions
9.26 Return
10.1 Acceptance
10.6 Proofreading
10.9 Payment
10.19 Proofreading

大智慧 2021-10-17

Overall, it's not bad.

山大王 2021-09-23

Hello, may I ask if it is necessary to upload the raw data three times or just once?

1205147966@qq.com 2021-08-14

Very slow, not recommended for graduates to invest.

幽谷客313 2021-08-02

Excuse me, I would like to ask, why is it that I always fail to generate a PDF when submitting my final article? Up until now, I have been unable to submit the article. I wonder if you have encountered this situation as well?

honghongLI 2021-07-30

2020.12.22 Submission
2021.2.6 Major revisions
2021.2.30 Resubmission after major revisions
2021.3.10 Returned for modifications
2021.3.25 Submission
2021.4.16 Major revisions
2021.4.29 Submission
2021.5.6 Accepted

Overall, the process was quite fast. This is my first SCI paper, and I was previously rejected by two journals, which greatly affected my confidence. There were three reviewers, and I had to make major revisions three times. I thought it would be rejected the last time, so I anxiously waited, but finally it was accepted, coinciding with my graduation. The submission system of this journal is slightly complicated, and the formatting requirements for the paper are very strict. Personally, I feel that the editor is nice, professional, and rigorous. With the help of the reviewers' comments, the quality of the paper has greatly improved. Thank you! I wish everyone success in their submissions!

SCI-maker 2021-06-26

Garbage collection station.

SCI-maker 2021-06-26

Good place to spend money and find excitement.

明水秋容 2021-06-19

Can I trouble you to inquire if this journal requires a submission fee for manuscript review?

明水秋容 2021-06-19

Can I trouble you to inquire whether it is necessary to pay a review fee when submitting the article?

& 2021-05-21

2020.12.30 Submission
2021.2.12 Major revision
2021.3.5 Submitted after modification - Checking
2021.3.15 Return for modifications
2021.3.15 Submission
2021.3.17 In review
2021.3.27 Minor revision
2021.4.6 Resubmitted after modification
2021.4.7 Minor revision - Submission
2021.4.20 Returned for revision (minor revision)
2021.4.21 Submission
2021.5.4 Accepted

夺笋小天才 2021-05-12

After submitting, I received the first round of revisions 1.5 months later. There were four reviewers, one of whom suggested minor changes to the images, while the other three provided more professional and sharp comments. The editor was highly competent and responsible. Based on the reviewers' feedback, the editor summarized the revisions for me, advising against adding any more experiments. I made modifications according to their suggestions throughout the entire paper and sincerely thanked the editor and reviewers. After 10 days, I resubmitted the revised document.

After 20 days, I received the second round of revisions. Two reviewers agreed to publish the paper, but the other two insisted on the need for additional experiments. As it was close to the holidays, I urgently arranged for animal experiments. It took me an additional month to revise the manuscript.

Half a month after the minor revisions, I was notified of acceptance. It took another month to review the publication format and pay the publication fee. One month later, the paper was finally published.

The submission to publication process took 5 months. Personally, I think the editor of this journal is very nice and professional. However, there were relatively many reviewers, and their opinions were somewhat mystical. Hahaha.

地学小子 2021-03-10

The first-instance major repairs were returned on March 1st, and it has been more than 10 days now, but there is still no feedback.

dicknenu 2021-02-26

Give opinions for major revisions within 2 months, and accept after revisions within 1 month. Considering the impact of the epidemic, I think this speed is still good. The reviewer is not very familiar with the research direction and the quality of the comments is average. The submission system is relatively cumbersome, and the editor has high requirements for formatting and similarity rate.

世界第一等2 2021-02-14

Submitted in December 2017, revised in March and accepted the next day after revision. I have to admire the rigor of the academic editor of the journal. I had high hopes for this journal at that time, and it has been consistently stable. It is not easy for a comprehensive journal with such a large number of publications to maintain its position in Zone 3. Thumbs up to PeerJ journal!