Over again 2023-08-07

Why is it that even though I have already submitted the revised draft in the new system, the status in the old system still shows "a revision has been started"? How should I handle this?

turn back time 2023-08-07

Is it useful for the journal to send a reminder to the editor? It's been a while since the second review and there is still no result.

ffz92 2023-08-03

Posted on July 26th, received a rejection letter on August 2nd, desk rejection. Although it falls within the scope of the journal and has some value, it was quickly assessed in order to ensure publication time. This is good as it saves time. However, no feedback was provided, so I am considering submitting it elsewhere.

1998FFF 2023-08-02

After resubmitting the major revision, it took about a month for it to change from "under review" to "awaiting recommendation". I thought the result was about to come out, but after two days, it changed back to "under review" again. It has been a week and there has been no further change. Has anyone experienced this situation? Does it mean it has been arbitrated?

turn back time 2023-07-31

Hello, may I ask if you directly received your major repairs after returning? Are there many comments from the three reviewers?

IIIWSBIII 2023-07-31

October 14, 2021, first submission
January 31, 2022, first rejection (3 reviewers, many comments, mainly regarding methodological innovation)
Due to various reasons in 2022, the article was put on hold
January 13, 2023, made substantial revisions and resubmitted to the system
April 19, 2023, completed second submission (had to be sent back by the editor several times due to formatting issues, including proofreading)
June 9, 2023, received major revision feedback (3 reviewers, mainly requesting additional comparative experiments and data analysis explanations)
July 25, 2023, accepted.

The journal has a high level of quality, with 3 reviewers, and it is not possible to proceed without their acceptance. The reviewers carefully examined the article and raised questions about many details. Overall, the review process was relatively fast.

YCZ 2023-07-23

Yes, only one reviewer provided feedback.

TT jia 2023-07-18

The old system is lowercase "r," and the new system is uppercase "R."

turn back time 2023-07-18

May I ask if the previous system displayed uppercase "R" or lowercase "r"?

TT jia 2023-07-18

After two months of review, the status has changed to "Awaiting Recommendation." Does anyone know if it means they are currently searching for reviewers, or if the paper has already been sent out, or if they have received feedback already?

FrankChan 2023-07-13

Hello, after submission, does the old system display "Under review" or "Under Review"? Is there a distinction in capitalization for the letter "R" in "review"?

q1a1 2023-07-10

Hello, did you receive only one reviewer's comments and then the journal rejected it directly?

一之濑夜 2023-07-09

I'm sorry, sometimes I may not frequently check the specific journal page. If you have any questions, you can actually add me as a friend and we can chat privately. This way, I will receive email notifications. Also, let's reply to the previous people together.

【yang6125】: I remember that I registered in the old system first and then submitted in the new system. I can't remember the specific details, but it seems that both systems need to be registered with the same email. You can try this operation first and see.

【turn back time】: I checked the detailed status and even the review comments of this article in the old system. If your new system and old system email accounts are the same, you can see the submission information by selecting "Author" in the top left corner of the homepage. Some reviewers may attach PDF files, but it seems that there is a bug in the new system and the attachments cannot be downloaded. You can only check them in the old system. However, since I am the corresponding author, I don't know if non-corresponding authors can also see them.

【1998FFF】: There is usually a delay in WoS retrieval, and my article has not been indexed yet. I don't check the retrieval report here, so I haven't noticed. However, you can send an email to WoS customer service and ask them.

turn back time 2023-07-06

Hello, may I ask whether you see the status of your second review AR in the old system or the new system? When I returned for rework after the first review, it showed "Under review" in lowercase in the old system. I wonder if this means it hasn't been sent for external review yet?

1998FFF 2023-07-03

Hello, I would like to ask how long it usually takes to retrieve the document after receiving it. Our school only accepts retrieval reports, but I noticed that it takes about three months to retrieve them on Web of Science (WoS). This is causing a lot of distress.

turn back time 2023-07-03

May I ask if you can find it on the old system now? I also want to know how to see the progress of the application on the old system for the new system.

yang6125 2023-07-02

Hello, I submitted my post on the new version of the system, but I couldn't log in to my account on the old version of the system at all. Could you please let me know how to submit a post on the new version of the system and check the status on the old system? Can you please explain the process?

yang6125 2023-07-02

Hello, I have encountered a problem and would like to ask for your advice. I am trying to submit a contribution on the new version of the system, but I cannot log in to my account on the old version of the system at all. Could you please tell me how you manage to submit contributions on the new version of the system and check the status on the old system?

yang6125 2023-07-02

Hello, I submitted my work on the new version of the system, but I couldn't log in to my account on the old version of the system at all. Could you please tell me how you managed to submit your work on the new version of the system and check the status on the old version of the system?

YCZ 2023-06-30

Only one reviewer has a comment.

YCZ 2023-06-30

After eight months of review, the opinions of one reviewer led to major revisions, and the editor rejected the submission. This journal is no longer an option.

zzyyll 2023-06-28

Is the username and password the same for the new and old systems? Why can't I log in? This is frustrating.

zzyyll 2023-06-28

I have one status showing "ur" and one "awaiting decision". Which one should I look at? I don't know if I've also been rejected...

风往北吹 2023-06-23

2022-11-25 submission
2022-11-25 under review
2023-3-4 Major revision
2023-4-7 revision submitted
2023-5-25 minor revision
2023-5-31 revision submitted
2023-6-22 Awaiting recommendation
2023-6 -23 Accept

Translation:
2022-11-25 submission
2022-11-25 under review
2023-3-4 Major revision
2023-4-7 revision submitted
2023-5-25 minor revision
2023-5-31 revision submitted
2023-6-22 Awaiting recommendation
2023-6-23 Accept

1998FFF 2023-06-20

Hello, we have received the comments on the major revision. May I ask if it is possible to exceed the specified 12-page limit after the modifications? Because we need to add an experiment with a dataset, which will definitely exceed this limit.

乔贴岭 2023-06-16

2023.1.18 Submission
2023.2.23 Major Renovation
2023.5.31 Minor Renovation
2023.6.12 Reception

marcusyang 2023-06-14

The initial review result is good. This journal usually does not directly give minor revisions or accept. Please reply to each question raised by the reviewers carefully and properly. Good luck!

Turbocc 2023-06-14

Latex online editor: https://texpage.com/
IEEE JBHI Latex template: https://template-selector.ieee.org/secure/templateSelector/publicationType
Old system: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jbhi-embs
New system: https://ieee.atyponrex.com/dashboard?journalCode=jbhi-embs

Turbocc 2023-06-14

2022-11-06 submission
2022-11-07 under review
2023-01-09 major revision
2023-03-26 revision submitted
2023-05-30 awaiting recommendation
2023-06-06 awaiting decision
2023-06-08 accept

A total of three reviewers provided feedback on the manuscript. The first reviewer gave six comments, the second reviewer gave nine, and the third reviewer gave three. The second reviewer requested the addition of two experiments to demonstrate generalization and asked for further explanation of certain parts of the article. The other two reviewers mainly asked questions and made modifications regarding the content and format of the article. The article was prepared using the IEEE JBHI Latex template. I recommend using the online version of TexPage for Latex editing, which I found to be convenient. I had previously installed Latex on my local machine and used VSCode for editing, but now I find the online version to be more convenient. For submission, the new system can be used, but after submission, it is recommended to check the status using the old system. I hope this information is helpful to everyone and wish you a successful submission!

turn back time 2023-06-11

Hello, may I ask if the same reviewers will be assigned after the major revision? I have been reviewing for six months as the first reviewer, and after the major revision, I received seven comments from three reviewers. One of them even just acknowledged my work and suggested uploading the code.