光学小白纸 2023-07-19

Return comments on July 17th, with minor revisions, major revisions, and rejection. The editor chose to reject and submit to Advanced Photonics Research. It seems to be positioned at most in the third or fourth district, so we can only submit to another journal.

Yenfung Chan 2023-07-07

Pequeñas revisiones

光学小白纸 2023-06-28

5.29 manuscript submitted
6.08 under review
It has been 20 days, a little slow.

哒哒哒ykc 2023-06-28

May I ask when will you be with the editor? It has been over ten days and I still haven't heard anything.

哒哒哒ykc 2023-06-28

6.15 manuscript submitted
6.27 Email inquiry to the editor
6.28 manuscript submitted
So slow, 13 days.

加加加减乘除 2023-06-03

May I ask how many days the editor will need for the day after tomorrow? Mine has been 9 days already, and it is still "submitted".

加加加减乘除 2023-06-03

How many days have you been with the editor? Mine has also been for 9 days, and it's still submitted.

丁继飞 2023-05-31

21 Mar 2023 Submission
28 Mar 2023 with editor
10 Apr 2023 under review
21 Apr 2023 major revision
20 May 2023 Resubmission after modification
31 May 2023 Acceptance without revision
The overall quality of the journal is satisfactory, and the impact factor and ranking are also quite good. The review speed is also acceptable, with the first review comments received within a month. Due to holidays and other commitments, the revisions were delayed, and an extra week was requested. The time from revision to final acceptance was around ten days.
I hope the journal continues to improve and can be promoted to a higher category in the field of Materials/Engineering.

光学小白纸 2023-05-31

The first author is unable to access it, only the corresponding author can. All authors can view it on the Author service when it is accepted.

材料人 2023-05-25

I would like to ask, how can we track the progress of the review for communication and first authorship?

今天你磕盐了吗 2023-05-18

0424 The comments on the manuscript came back, and there were major revisions required. Three reviewers raised almost 20 questions.
0510 Going back.
0514 Under review.
Communication with the copy editor and reviewers.

棒棒糖坤 2023-05-12

It has been 9 days since submission and the status is still "manuscript submitted". What's going on? Has it not reached the editor yet? Is there a high volume of submissions recently?

Zhihan666 2023-05-05

No particular thoughts, currently within our team the goal is to submit to as many free journals as possible, as publishing articles is too expensive. Hopefully, AOM can elevate to a higher category in the future.

科研仕子小马 2023-04-28

The editor did not transfer AOM to me. I have to transfer it myself.

科研仕子小马 2023-04-25

Finally, AFM has been edited after waiting for 8 days. Can you please transfer it to AOM?

今天你磕盐了吗 2023-04-19

0324 under review
0419 Why haven't you replied yet? Nervous gkd

科研仕子小马 2023-04-18

I directly make a curve to save the country, AI + super materials. The writing is quite rubbish, I want to submit to AOM (Academy of Management), but I thought about submitting to AFM (Academy of Financial Management) first to see if the editor can transfer it to AOM. If not, I will just directly send it. If rejected, I will go and submit to Nanoph.

光学小白纸 2023-04-17

A total of two submissions were made, both requiring major revisions. The first submission was made on January 28th and accepted on April 4th. The second submission was made on February 13th and accepted on April 14th. Since the status has not changed for a long time, it is suggested to send an email to inquire about the progress. The journal will quickly respond and handle the matter. Overall, it is very good, with a requirement for major revisions followed by minor revisions before acceptance. I hope the journal continues to improve and reach the top tier.

井井 2023-04-12

2023.04.04 Submit
2023.04.12 With Editor

小伊轻舟 2023-04-04

From submission to acceptance, it took two months, and the editor was very reliable.

Yenfung Chan 2023-03-29

3.18-Major Revision translates to "March 18th - Major Revision" in English.

今天你磕盐了吗 2023-03-23

Rejected by AFM one day after application (I'm really impressed with this speed. When I asked others, they said it took several days to a week, but it only took me a day...). The editor asked me to apply to AOM instead, and I applied that same night. The current result is unknown, and I will keep updating.

Yenfung Chan 2023-03-12

Under Review, it's a bit slow.

Yenfung Chan 2023-02-28

Already submitted, with editor status.

327050133 2023-02-17

Revised and received approximately two weeks ago. Received online about ten days ago. However, it has been almost two months since it went online, and it is still in the early view stage, not formally published...

FeifeiXin 2022-12-14

A review article was submitted to AM, and it is recommended to transfer it to AOM about a week later. Three days after the transfer, it is under review. After three weeks, the reviewer's comments are returned, with two reviewers providing positive feedback, and the editor suggests major revisions. Approximately 10 days after the return, it is accepted.

李丹 2022-12-13

May I ask how many days it took to go from repair to receiving?

江南雨夜梦 2022-12-06

Rejected 10 days after submission, it is recommended to submit elsewhere.

327050133 2022-11-22

The submissions to NC and SA were rejected, and then the submission to AFM was transferred to AOM.
The submission was sent for review for three days, and the results were out in 40 days, requiring major revisions.
The three reviewers had a total of over ten questions, and from their comments, it seemed like they were all inexperienced and possibly didn't even read the paper carefully.
After two days of revisions, the paper was accepted.

The overall experience of the initial submission was average. The impact factor of AOM has been increasing rapidly, but the submission experience was a bit lacking. If I submit again in the future, I hope to encounter better reviewers.

outer欧克 2022-11-15

Only the speed is satisfactory.
One reviewer rejected, one accepted, and the editor gave the rejection.
In response to the shameless reasons of the reviewers, we appealed and the editor agreed to reconsider. (Key point)
Then in the second review, it was still rejected, with the exact same reasons as the first time. (Key point)
I just don't understand, why did they agree to reconsider our submission in the first place?? It wasted a month of time.
We can accept being rejected, but what we don't understand is the extremely shameless reasons for rejection and the waste of time.
The reason behind all this is that the reviewers are simply not familiar with this field, and the editor's choice of reviewers is highly problematic.
I suggest submitting to well-established journals. This kind of experience can be extremely frustrating.