动物世界 2023-04-10

This comment is great.

QingZh 2023-04-10

The initial review takes one month, the secondary review takes half a month, and the editing efficiency is particularly high! I hope that domestic journals will continue to improve!

GOBIAS 2022-11-08

Posted on October 8th, minor revisions on October 28th, and accepted on November 7th!

小强君 2021-10-22

Excuse me, when you submitted your contribution, did you choose OA or non-OA? Thank you.

小强君 2021-10-22

May I ask, when you submitted your work, did you choose non-OA or OA? Thank you.

Yixin@ 2021-09-23

Received: 18 May 2021
Revised: 29 August 2021
Accepted: 30 August 2021

It can be said that it was very fast; the editorial department was very efficient. Usually, they directly send it to the reviewers. They gave a major revision after about a month, and after making the changes, it was resubmitted after 19 days. Then, in less than a month, they gave a minor revision, and about 10 days later, it was accepted. The evaluations from the three reviewers were also very detailed and fair. They provided suggestions for improvement and helped me refine the article. It's my first SCI publication, and I'm very happy. I will continue to work hard.

romankk 2021-07-26

2021-03-17 submit
2021-03-18 with editor
03-21 under review
04-15 required reviews completed
04-25 decision in process & major revise need
05-15 revised submit
First review, second review both took over a month, and the minor revisions in the third review took less than a month. Finally accepted on 07-26.
There were quite a few reviewers, and they were quite professional, providing some in-depth research suggestions. However, the editor seemed busy, sometimes taking two weeks to process the revised submission.
Overall, the speed was fast. This was my first SCI paper, so there were inevitably some irregularities in the process of revision, response, and manuscript submission. However, as long as I answered carefully, made every effort to revise, and used appropriate wording, I believe that articles with opportunities for revision have a high success rate. I hope that my colleagues can all gain something from this experience, and I hope that your journal will continue to improve.

cathay 2021-03-26

2020-9-16 Submission
2020-2-21 Reception
Three months after submission, I received revision comments. The experts were very responsible, patient, and provided valuable revision suggestions, as well as some new research ideas. I am very grateful. After completing the revisions, I received an acceptance notice in about a month.