123nano 2023-08-09

Hello! Currently, I have submitted an article to the same editor (Prof. Pimchai Chaiyen). It has been 10 days, and there has been no response. I would like to ask how long it usually takes for your article to be processed?

必中必中 2023-08-05

My situation is also like this. May I ask if you eventually changed the editor?

mayuan-ecu 2023-07-28

Overall, the editing efficiency is very high, and the reviewers are also very meticulous and responsible. I wish ACS Catalysis continued to improve and I also wish everyone a smooth submission process.

mayuan-ecu 2023-07-28

2023.5.23 submitted
Within three days, it was with the editor.
5.26 under review
6.23 minor revisions, given two weeks to make changes.
6.26 received delayed reviewer's comments.
Sent a letter to request an extension for the revision deadline until 7.12; conducted additional experimentation and calculations.
7.12 submitted the revised draft.
7.13 accepted.

xuedan 2023-07-25

The situation is the same as yours, I have been still for 12 days now.

弥彦 2023-07-11

Submitted on June 30th, the deputy editor has been assigned one day later, and there has been no progress for 11 days until now.

花火夜空 2023-07-05

@Shijian Xiaoyao In this state, for ACS's submission system, the status is not determined by the "status" but by the category to which the entire article belongs. That is the true "article status".

ttxsy 2023-06-26

Excuse me, has the review feedback come back now?

马源 2023-06-15

Submitted on May 23rd, currently under review; hoping for good results, there isn't much time left to wait...

不忘初心+1 2023-06-11

Submitted on 5.28, it arrived at the editor's side on the 29th, and it has been 20 days already, but there has been no progress. Are journal efficiency levels really this low now?

ttxsy 2023-06-09

2023-5-27 Submission
Currently undergoing peer review

ssaaa 2023-05-26

Submitted on April 21, received decision on May 25. Three reviewers, two minor revisions, one inappropriate journal. Editor rejected.

Chenxin Su 2023-05-24

May I ask what progress has been made now? I am also an editor.

小草1991 2023-05-17

Who is the editor? What is the current result?

BZJ- 2023-05-13

Posted on April 7th, assigned editor on the same day.
Submitted for review on April 29th.
I have high hopes for this journal and hope ACS Catalysis continues to improve.

anwank 2023-05-11

Submitted for review for 36 days, still no news.

chemeng 2023-05-10

5.10 is still ae assigned, the editor is Jingguang Chen.
It has been 22 days since 4.18, and it still hasn't been sent for review. After so many years of submitting to ACS journals, this is the first time it has happened.

许文强 2023-05-06

4.13 Revise submitted
4.14 The reviewer agrees to accept, requesting a small modification, and will return on the same day
4.14 Accepted on the same evening

chemeng 2023-05-05

Posted on 4.18, it was placed with the editor for 10 days, and now it has been with the deputy editor for another week. Has the United States really undergone a change? Where did the previous efficiency go?

weiruicongrong 2023-04-28

I submitted my post on the same day as the OP (original poster), and it only went online this month.

许文强 2023-04-14

Reviewer's second review comments have returned, with a small issue. The editor mentioned pre-acceptance and made changes to that small issue, as well as fixed several formatting problems. It quickly came back. Hoping for immediate acceptance and a pre-defense next week. Three first-tier articles in four years of doctoral studies, just aiming for a stable graduation.

许文强 2023-04-14

4.13 minor revision: This means that there is a minor modification or adjustment needed for whatever is being referred to.

4.14 submitted: This indicates that something has been formally handed in or sent for consideration or review.

4.14 under review: This means that whatever has been submitted is currently being evaluated or examined by someone or a group for a decision or feedback.

BZJ- 2023-04-14

Posted on April 7th, assigned editor on the same day, still not under review as of April 14th, hoping for a positive outcome!

许文强 2023-04-13

The efficiency is very high. There were minor and major revisions. The reviewer for the major revision provided 18 comments. Both reviewers were very professional. It took a long time to make the modifications, hoping for good results.

许文强 2023-04-13

3.3 Submitted
3.4 Under Review
3.17 Major Revision
4.10 Submitted
4.10 Under Review

3.3 Submitted
3.4 Under Review
3.17 Major Revision
4.10 Submitted
4.10 Under Review

2019zyza 2023-03-20

2.16 Submission
2.17 Under review

一叶知秋 2023-02-22

The submission was made 5 days ago and is still assigned to an associated editor. Has the recent editor been slow in handling the manuscript?

花火夜空 2023-02-21

I didn't see any relevant news at all. I searched on Little Blue Bird and found a news article about this female professor who led the Spanish king (she is Spanish herself) to visit the Max Planck Institute's Hubble Research Institute, where she works. I couldn't find any information about academic misconduct at all. I wonder if the person above misunderstood the news?

木侠 2023-02-16

Why were you expelled?

一 2023-02-16

Beatriz Roldan Cuenya, who is in charge of heterogeneous catalysis, is still named on the magazine's official website. However, in reality, she has been removed from the editor's list by ACS since the end of last year due to a well-known academic misconduct incident. She is the second deputy editor to be dismissed from ACS Catalysis.