wangrfv56 2023-06-13

The quality of the article has improved.

bear2022 2023-05-05

Indeed, the reviewers all agreed, but the editorial department rejected it.

shjwhg 2023-04-10

Currently, Frontiers is facing a public opinion battle. They reject you for any reason, template rejection, without giving you any clear explanation. Be cautious before investing!

XIAO油菜花 2023-02-03

221202 submission, 230131 acceptance. There were 4 reviewers: 1 reject, 1 acceptance, and the other 2 requested minor revisions. After answering the reviewers' questions regarding the minor revisions, the paper was accepted. The initial reject reviewer did not respond. After another week, the editor decided to publish the paper. The overall efficiency was fast!

ATime233 2022-07-31

The following text translates to English as: "Demands for innovation are necessary; the reviewers and editors are very efficient. After making the necessary revisions, it only took 2 days for them to accept the submission."

zz 2022-06-27

An article on cell regeneration has been accepted for submission. Currently, I am revising another article related to single-cell sequencing. The suggestions from the two reviewers are acceptable this time. The first one is particularly professional and provided many useful suggestions. The second one seems to have less understanding of single-cell sequencing, but still gave some helpful advice. It will probably take two weeks to make the revisions. I haven't returned to my home country yet, so I'm not sure why people in China think Frontiers is not very reputable. Is it because there are too many Chinese researchers? However, I see very few comments on Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience here.