认证评论 - STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

Chris PENG 2023-07-13

Rejected, the direction is not suitable, do not want computer control related ones, it seems that only engineering and technical related ones are required.

Chris PENG 2023-07-09

It is indeed slow. It has been a week and the status is still "new submission". Didn't the official website say they would provide feedback within 6 days? Waiting...

xucz 2023-07-06

Recently it seems to be really slow. I submitted it on 6.22, and it has been two weeks now, but it is still a new submission.

上善若水 2023-06-21

6.1 Submission
6.20 under review

上善若水 2023-06-12

It used to be very fast, but this time the submission has become slow. It has been twelve days already, and it is still a new submission.

0103. 2023-06-12

May I ask, was the speed faster before? I haven't voted yet.

上善若水 2023-06-11

I just submitted an article on June 1st. The progress is slow, it's been 10 days and it's still in "New Submission". Is there anyone else experiencing the same situation as me?

xpection 2023-05-24

After receiving, you can choose non-OA and do not need to pay.

zjut-123 2023-03-27

May I ask if it is possible to choose between OA (Open Access) and non-OA for the accepted submission? I noticed that the publication fee is over $3000, which seems a bit expensive.

&冬季 2023-03-05

Although it was quite bumpy, the outcome is good. Congratulations!

xpection 2023-03-04

2022/07/17 Submission
2022/08/29 Major Revision
2022/09/14 Revision
2022/11/15 Major Revision
2022/12/09 Revision
2023/02/28 Accepted with final modifications required
2023/03/01 Revision
2023/03/03 Accepted

Both revisions were major revisions.
In the first major revision, two reviewers provided over ten comments.
In the second major revision, based on the comments, the first reviewer suggested acceptance, while the second reviewer suggested rejection (the rejection comments mentioned that my previous response did not adequately address their questions and included one unconvincing result, which made me cry......). The editor was excellent and sought a third (new) reviewer, who suggested minor revisions based on the comments. In this major revision, I provided a detailed response to the second reviewer's comments (addressing one question in two pages) and included a new case study to demonstrate the validity of the results.
In the third revision, the paper was accepted, but some formatting adjustments were required (according to the editor's comments, I used too many custom abbreviations in the article, which affected readability).

In conclusion, I appreciate the opportunity given by the editor and wish SMO (the journal or organization) continued success.

colinzhang 2023-02-24

The phrase "Accept but needs final editing" means that something is accepted or approved, but it still requires some final editing or revisions before it is considered complete.

colinzhang 2023-02-24

Now it is "Accept but needs final editing," do we still need to wait for the requirements from the other side? The supervisor said they don't understand what it means to wait for proofreading requirements...

sleeped 2023-02-22

Hello, I saw online that this journal requires original data for submission. How do I submit it?

&冬季 2023-02-18

After my "Under Review" status, the date changed once in the past few days, and yesterday it changed to "Reviewers Assigned," but it is still unclear what it means. What is your current progress situation now?

天黑请闭眼 2023-02-09

That's good... trembling with fear, waiting for the result.

天黑请闭眼 2023-02-09

Doesn't the format get modified after the editor is assigned...?

&冬季 2023-02-04

What progress have you made so far?

嘿哟yu 2023-01-15

Okay, got it. Thank you very much!

&冬季 2023-01-15

No need, he mainly wants to emphasize Conflict of interests and Replication of results at the end. The title page can be normal, just pay attention to the citation format. My first submission was rejected for formatting, and after making the necessary changes and resubmitting, it was rejected again. After checking, I resubmitted it and it was sent for review after 2 weeks.

嘿哟yu 2023-01-14

Excuse me, besides the basic contents such as the title, should the title page also include the title "Statements and Declarations", followed by "Competing Interests" below, and finally "Acknowledgments and Funding Information"? It has already been returned twice due to formatting.

chao311 2023-01-07

The same situation occurred, I don't know why.

456mutouren 2022-12-14

Very good journal, the speed is approximately 3-5 months from submission to acceptance, and the comments are also very reasonable, which is very helpful for improving the quality of the article.

&冬季 2022-11-21

2022.11.21 Editor Assigned

&冬季 2022-11-18

2022.11.16 was sent back by Joe for formatting revisions, it is now a new submission.

xucz 2022-11-18

I want to ask if anyone has experienced a situation where the status of a paper changed from "under review" to "Reviewers Assigned," and then after a few days, it changed back to "under review," and now it has changed again to "Reviewers Assigned." I'm not sure why it keeps changing repeatedly. Is it because they cannot find reviewers?

abcvivian 2022-11-15

Excuse me, experienced friends, what is the subsequent process after this magazine accepts my submission? I received an email requesting me to send the full LaTeX file, but the recipient's email rejects emails with attachments. I contacted the editorial team, and they said it should be submitted through the system, and the distribution department will handle it after acceptance. Could you please advise me on how to proceed? I'm in a hurry.

xucz 2022-11-15

Changed, it will be submitted for review on November 9th, still quite fast.

&冬季 2022-11-12

Has your status for the new submission changed?

&冬季 2022-11-11

2022.11.05, continuously New submission;

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started