认证评论 - SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

夜空的小幸运 2021-12-11

If you don't choose OA, you don't need to pay.

水天一色6664 2021-12-07

Does this journal require payment for page fees?

MadaoBu 2021-11-22

If you don't do OA, then you won't have to pay.

szw 2021-11-22

Can I ask how much is the layout fee for submissions? I heard it's over 18,000 yuan.

夜空的小幸运 2021-11-22

The journal speed is relatively fast. The feedback came back about half a month after it was submitted at the end of October, requiring major revisions. Three experts provided more than 30 suggestions, and it took about 4 to 5 days to make the modifications. After the revisions were submitted, it was accepted within a week.

昆仑农夫 2021-11-20

I have submitted it more than a month ago, and after receiving the modifications, I resubmitted it. Many significant suggestions were given, which greatly improved the article.
I would like to ask, is there a high probability of acceptance in this situation? I am in a hurry to graduate. Thank you all.

MadaoBu 2021-11-13

This journal is unpredictable. It takes one month for minor revisions after peer review for one article, and it takes four months for minor revisions for my junior colleague's article. Another article was rejected by the editor after 20 days of review.

昆仑农夫 2021-11-13

Congratulations, I hope everyone can have good luck. I currently submitted my work 25 days ago and it is still under review. I am anxious to graduate, quite urgent.

iambaiii 2021-11-11

Soon, the submission was made at the end of July, and on August 14th, the minor revisions were returned. With some slight modifications, it took a week, and the acceptance was given the next day. The total time taken was 27 days.

guanjujuju 2021-11-01

under review The last three months yelled to transfer to other magazines and had no opinions, felt shocked, it's better to be rejected with some opinions, right?

lc1 2021-10-14

Faster than expected, I received the reviewer's comments one month after submission. It took me two weeks to revise (major revision). The waiting time afterwards was relatively long, and it took another month to resubmit for review. However, it was accepted directly after two weeks of review, which was quite lucky. I hope it brings good luck to everyone as well.

十钱捉妖师 2021-09-09

At the end of March, it was directly assigned to the reviewer by the editor. On May 7th, minor revisions were given, and the article was hardly changed. It was accepted at the end of May.

huahua的花 2021-08-30

It's really too slow. I waited for nearly 6 months from submission to rejection. I even followed up once during this period. If you are not in a hurry to publish the article, you can give it a try.

w222 2021-08-20

The review process is indeed a bit slow, but it is relatively easy to get accepted. I submitted two papers, and both were accepted after major revisions.

huahua的花 2021-08-19

I submitted it in March and rushed it like you did, but, sigh, this journal is really too slow.

lc1 2021-08-14

Much faster than expected, the results were returned within a month. They provided major revisions (but requested a new manuscript to be resubmitted, which will be re-reviewed, although my supervisor mentioned it is likely to be sent back to the original reviewer). The feedback provided was not very specific, making it difficult to make the changes. They allowed 42 days for the revisions.

xiaoleeya 2021-08-06

Posted on May 21, 2021, it has been almost 2.5 months now. I sent an email to the editor a week ago, and they replied saying that one reviewer has already finished reviewing it. I don't know how much longer it will take to get the results. It's a bit slow.

xiaoleeya 2021-08-06

It has been almost 3 months since the submission, and it is still under review. It's a bit slow.

Zinnia 2021-06-30

Finally returned with feedback, for repair~

huahua的花 2021-06-28

Hey, the child is waiting for its school application.

w222 2021-06-23

Very slow, like a snail.

huahua的花 2021-06-19

Have your statuses been updated?

huahua的花 2021-06-19

I have also been under review for more than two months, and I want to give a reminder.

Yalilili 2021-06-19

Pretty fast, submitted on April 22nd, accepted on June 16th, less than two months.

Zinnia 2021-06-05

Excuse me, has your situation changed now? Mine has been under review for nearly 6 months.

rocky 2021-06-04

It is really slow. It took seven months and almost three months in the hands of the editor before the manuscript was sent for review. There was also a change in the submission system of the journal during this period. Fortunately, it was finally accepted.

Submitted on 11/03/2020 and remained "with editor" since then. Sent two reminders for the status update.

Under review as of 02/26/2021.

Major revision requested on 03/24/2021. Two reviewers raised a total of 59 questions, and we carefully responded to their comments and made revisions to the paper.

Submitted on 04/16/2021.

Accepted on 06/03/2021.

I do not recommend this journal for those who are in a hurry to publish their papers.

Zinnia 2021-05-12

It has been almost 5 months since "Under Review" in January, and there has been no progress at all. Anyone else in the same situation? I'm worried that I will have to wait a few more months and then receive a rejection message~

名字难起 2021-04-15

The repair has not been submitted for review for a long time, so slow.

词汇随身背 2021-04-03

Investments made at the beginning of September may take anywhere from one to three months to show results. It is not recommended for those in a hurry to invest.

ph.d li 2021-04-03

This Nimmi T is a staff member of the Impurity Editing Department, very friendly, and always replies promptly whenever I inquire. The main problem is that the current editor-in-chief of the magazine is really terrible...

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now