金龙215 2023-05-10

Why can't "online" be searched for so long?

20220429 2023-02-23

The speed is very fast, hoping for a score increase this year.

herk 2022-12-27

Fast speed, the reviewer is too unqualified.

Yanting Su 2022-12-06

First submission to this journal, received comments in about 20 days for the first time, with only one reviewer. The comments were mainly about content modifications and the addition of a small experiment. The editor rejected the paper but allowed for resubmission after modifications. I made the revisions and resubmitted. It has been over four months since the submission, and there has been no response. I have sent reminders for a week, but there has been no reply. During this period, the status changed from "under review" to "required review completed," but after some time, it changed back to "under review." I'm not sure if anyone has encountered a similar situation. I'm quite anxious. Should I send another reminder?

行者~ 2022-12-06

The review process takes about 20 days. The submission was made on October 8th, and major revisions were given on October 28th. Revisions were returned on November 14th, and minor revisions were made on December 4th. The same day, further revisions were made, and acceptance was received on December 6th.
The review was very meticulous, and the editor also helped to fix many minor issues.

XMS 2022-11-04

I submitted my work in March this year, and the review process was fast. It took about 20 days for the review, and there were two reviewers who provided non-binding opinions that could be modified. However, the editor directly said that it couldn't be published and rejected it. I feel quite frustrated and don't know the reason why.

123456hua 2022-09-28

7.25 Submission
7.27 Under review
8.12 Required reviews completed
8.18 Required reviews completed
8.23 Required reviews completed
8.24 Decision in process
8.25 Revision (4 reviewers, given one month to revise)
The following dates are not very accurate, but around mid-September, the revised manuscript was returned, and acceptance notification was given by the end of September.
The editorial team's efficiency in handling the manuscript was very high, and the reviewers' comments were very helpful.

self-help 2022-09-12

7.28 Submitted
8.30 Under review
8.7 Under review
8.15 Under review
8.31 Under review
The current status is unknown, hoping for good news.

糖长老 2022-05-05

Submitted, rejected, 5 reviewers, future researchers beware!

糖长老 2022-03-14

2022.2.16 Submitted
2022.2.18 Under Review
2022.3.11 Required Reviews Completed

前行的路上 2022-03-08

2021.11.02 with Editor
2021.12.06 major revision (two months for revision)
2022.2.01 with Editor
2022.2.15 decision in process
2022.3.8 accept

This article has gone through many ups and downs, and it was submitted during my work period. Looking back, it was a unique experience to go home alone after work and revise the paper. Finally, I can say that my efforts have paid off.

The journal is an established European journal, and the efficiency of the editors is relatively high. The reviewers' questions were fair, with a total of 43 comments from three individuals. Due to work reasons, the revisions took longer, otherwise, it could have been published earlier.

Lastly, I wish the journal continued success and improvement!

Ph.Der 2021-04-21

Looking back at my previous comments, it feels quite nostalgic. Although I am currently pursuing a Ph.D. at South University, I still encounter difficulties in submitting articles. However, seeing myself suddenly enlightened at this moment, I wish myself good luck and smooth submission. Keep going, zy!