hj2006 2023-07-25

Is there a layout fee?

平遥中德居客栈 2023-07-20

Submission 10-Aug-2022
Major revision 08-Mar-2023
Submitted after modification 15-Mar-2023
Minor revision 25-May-2023
Submitted after modification 29-May-2023
Accepted 18-Jul-2023
Vehicle Engineering Hybrid Vehicle Energy Management Direction
Lasted for eleven months

hj2006 2023-07-20

Does this journal charge a page fee?

WZY0531 2023-07-05

Hello, I would like to ask if you have received the feedback on your paper: "Before submitting your revised manuscript please ensure that you have obtained all necessary permissions for any material in your paper that has been previously published."

WZY0531 2023-07-05

Hello, I would like to ask if you have received the following comment on your paper: "Before submitting your revised manuscript please ensure that you have obtained all necessary permissions for any material in your paper that has been previously published." I'm not sure what it means.

Tikizyx 2023-05-24

2023.03.24 - Major revision
2.23.05.23 - Rejection

This journal can still reject the paper during the re-review process. The first time, the reviewer didn't mention anything, and the second time, they said it lacked novelty. It's frustrating. Moreover, the review process is taking too long now, wasting over six months. Haha.

天涯的心跳 2023-05-15

Just asking all the Newton experts, how can I correctly send an email to the editor? I sent two retraction letters but they seem to have disappeared... Besides contacting the journal through the submission system, are there any other effective ways?

acc_a 2023-03-14

21-Nov-2022 submission
14-Mar-2023 peer review

Tikizyx 2023-02-20

2022.10.02 Submission
2022.10.05 Peer review in process
2023.02.20 Awaiting Recommendation

zzzpeng 2023-01-23

Hello, could you please provide the tex template for submitting to the journal? 2817087216@q

天落微微雨 2023-01-12

This journal seems to have become open source, and its influence is expected to take off quickly.

玲子哥 2023-01-01

Twisty and turny, brothers, if you have enough time, I recommend it; if you don't have enough time, I don't suggest it. The review is fast, but the editorial department is slow in processing.

6.8 submit--6.16 Awaiting AE Processing--7.3 Peer review in process--8.3 Awaiting Recommendation--9.5 Awaiting Decision--9.6 Major revision--9.26 Resubmit/Awaiting Admin Processing--9.27 Awaiting AE Processing--9.30 Peer review in process--11.7 Awaiting Recommendation--11.20 Awaiting Decision--11.21 Minor revision, there are some language issues.--11.25 Resubmit--- Awaiting Admin Processing--11.26 Awaiting AE Processing--11.30 Peer review in process--12.20 Accept

躺平的骚年 2022-12-14

2022 7 16 Submitted
2022 9 08 major revision
2022 10 16 revision submitted
2022 12 07 Accept
Two reviewers, over ten comments, greatly helped with the article! Sharing with everyone, the estimated time for "Awaiting recommendation" is about two weeks, and "Awaiting Decision" is about one week.

爱吃肉的小李 2022-12-08

What happened afterwards? Mine also received comments from external review, and now it is awaiting recommendation.

罗淦 2022-11-29

The expert in renovation provided more than 20 suggestions to help with the revision of the thesis.

nanbo 2022-11-26

In the system, ADM can be seen, but it is unclear which specific person AE refers to.

躺平的骚年 2022-11-25

A few reviewers, wow.

躺平的骚年 2022-11-25

Do you know who AE is, bro?

nanbo 2022-11-20

2022.8.1 Submission
2022.10.5 Major revision
2022.10.28 Revised
2022.11.12 Minor revision
2022.11.15 Revised
2022.11.18 Accept
The editing process was very fast, and the review cycle was also quite friendly. The opinions of the reviewers were very professional and played a significant role in the acceptance of the paper. Overall, I am quite satisfied.

走走旧路 2022-10-19

2022.3.7 Submission
2022.8.15 Major revision
2022.9.1 Revision
2022.9.10 Accept
2022.10 Online
The editing efficiency is high, and the processing speed of the manuscript is fast. They responded promptly to two reminders during the process. The only drawback is that it took a bit long to find reviewers. However, the reviewers' comments were professional, and overall, I am quite satisfied.

seeyoungjh 2022-08-25

4.19 Submission
6.16 Minor Revision
6.22 Revised
8.24 Accepted
After the revision, the efficiency was slow, and it took almost a month for Awaiting Recommendation.

j1233 2022-08-21

2022.3 Submission
June Major Revision
July Early Return
August Early Acceptance
The suggestions given by the three reviewers are very helpful for future writing. It feels like having a big colleague in the field and two smaller colleagues. One of the reviewers raised very good questions, which directly influenced the acceptance of the paper. By carefully revising each point based on the suggested modifications, there was a possibility of acceptance. It is quite good for students in the field of vehicle dynamics to publish a paper in this journal.

awen 2022-08-19

It has been two to three months and there is still no outcome. Is this waiting for the decision of the editor-in-chief?

约德尔人的小炒肉 2022-08-13

What happens after "awaiting decision"? I am currently in the same status. If it directly goes to "awaiting recommendation" after "awaiting decision," does that mean it will be rejected?

SCIgogogo 2022-08-10

I would like to ask everyone how long it takes for this journal to be officially published after going online.

Eric song 2022-08-10

Rejected after two and a half months, with four reviewers. Three provided suggestions without clear inclination, while one explicitly recommended major revisions. However, the associate editor ultimately decided to reject the submission. This is my first graduate paper, and I indeed feel that the theoretical depth is insufficient, and the experimental design is not satisfactory. I will strive to do better in the future.

小牛哥 2022-07-18

The review process of this journal is exceptionally fast.

Keanurora 2022-07-10

After submission, it was quickly reviewed, and the initial review results were returned in about 35 days. The first round of revisions was minor, while the second round of revisions required major editing, taking about 2 and a half months. One of the reviewers for the major revisions was very professional and provided many meaningful suggestions (although I did not ultimately adopt them). The other reviewer for the major revisions was average and commented that my work did not really work (though it was actually because he didn't understand it).

After two months of revisions, the paper was resubmitted. Due to significant changes, it was almost rewritten, and went through the review process once again. The reviewers for the major revisions were the same two experts from the initial review, and both agreed to accept the paper.

The journal's review process felt relatively fast, and the editor was very good! The requirements for the article were not high - as long as the article was sufficiently complete, there was a chance of acceptance.

王健龙 2022-03-03

What does "Awaiting AE Processing" mean in the current status after major repairs and return for repair? Does anyone know? Thank you.

xiaoxx 2022-02-14

Posted on September 18, 2021,
Major revision on November 3, 2021,
Revised on December 17, 2021,
Accepted on January 17, 2022.
The overall review process was still very fast, and the editor was very responsible. However, during the initial review, there were five reviewers with over twenty comments.