认证评论 - PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

阿三爱阿笠 2023-02-11

2022.10.12: Submitted
2022.10.21: All Reviewers Secured
2022.11.16: Major Revision
2022.12.10: Revised Paper Submitted
2023.01.03: Minor Revision
2023.01.11: Revised Paper Submitted
2023.01.16: Accept
The AIP submission system's various process nodes and timelines are very clear and user-friendly for authors.
At this stage, there are three standard reviewers for POP, and their feedback is generally able to pinpoint the key issues and greatly improve the article.
Highly recommended long-standing journal!

真理的火炬 2022-12-05

The long-established plasma physics journal received extremely detailed review comments from three reviewers, which greatly helped to improve the quality of the article.

more paper more delight 2022-11-17

In terms of the journal itself, it definitely cannot compare to those several Review series journals. However, the influence of the plasma journal itself is limited, so POP can be considered a good journal. Overall, the peer review process is very standard and fast, with three reviewers who are experts in this field. The questions they raise are quite profound and need to be answered well. Submitted on August 19th, major revisions requested on September 22nd, returned on October 20th, minor revisions requested on November 4th, returned on November 16th, and accepted on November 17th.

gx 2022-10-11

The speed is really fast. After the minor revision, it was directly accepted after the second review. It took a total of 44 days from the initial submission to acceptance, and I managed to catch up with the scholarship. I feel great.

甘甘9393 2022-01-08

May I ask how long it takes to submit the proofreading after being hired?

山芋派 2021-12-27

The impact factor is not high, but it is not a low-quality journal either. There are many high-level relevant references. AIP reviewers have always been fast, and this time it took about 40 days for the review, which was very detailed. There were around 60 comments from two reviewers. After responding to the comments, the paper was accepted. I actually really like AIP's submission system, as it is very clear for each step of the process.

小魔王0129 2021-10-27

I personally witnessed POP fall from IF 2.5 all the way below 2. Initially, there was only one reviewer, but by the end of 2019, it increased to two, and now three reviewers are standard. The Impact Factor has also been steadily increasing to above 2. Having three reviewers for articles in the third tier may not be cost-effective, but this journal itself is still quite good, and the work done there is also commendable.

沈伟晓 2021-02-28

Recently, I have been working on Alfven waves in plasmas. I have read a lot of high-level research on the topic, which has been very inspiring. It is considered one of the top three journals in the field of plasma, so I hope to publish an article in it.

dirac12 2021-02-24

An authoritative academic journal in the field of plasma physics, and the twin sibling of "Physics of Fluids," the quality is very good!

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started