小奕在努力 2023-07-03

God knows PCCP, I feel that physical chemistry is pretty good, IF 3.3 is very strange... Haha, it was 3.9 before.

LH 2023-06-28

Split, the impact factor has dropped to 3.3.

小奕在努力 2023-06-19

The proofreading usually takes 7-14 days. Mine was published with authorization, as for the proof, my summary will be a little later.

wyyi 2023-06-16

Do you know how long it will be published, brother? I asked you to proofread it, and I should be in the same issue as you.

wyyi 2023-06-16

The following text translates to English as:
"Submitted on 4.24.
Two reviewers on 5.16, major revisions.
Returned with revisions on 5.31.
Accepted on 6.15.
Both the editor and reviewers are very good, and the process was quite fast."

小奕在努力 2023-06-12

Received a job offer during the graduation dinner. Review article.
6-11 Accepted
6-12 Authorized
6-12 Published
Thank you, editor.
Prof. Prabal Kumar Maiti, Indian Academy of Sciences.

小奕在努力 2023-05-06

04-18 Revised
04-22 Submitted for review again
05-06 Still under review
...

XXW90 2023-04-25

Translation: "Submitted on March 30th, it has been nearly a month and it is still 'with editor.' Has anyone encountered this situation before? I asked the editor, and they said the workload has been high recently."

小奕在努力 2023-04-12

2023-4-11 Second received review comments
2023-4-12 Editor has not yet made a decision and sent an email.

小奕在努力 2023-04-11

Received the first revision comments on April 11, 2023.

小奕在努力 2023-04-02

A review article on Crystal Growth & Design was accepted but rejected by the editor again due to a 36% similarity check. After revision, it was resubmitted to PCCP. There were several changes between peer review and with the editor. As of 04-02, one reviewer agreed to review... Hoping for good luck.

DK不吃榴莲 2023-03-28

The reviewers were very professional, and the editor was also very nice in terms of my research in cluster physics. The review process was relatively fast.

小奕在努力 2023-03-12

2023-03-03 Submitted
2023-03-04 With Editor
2023-03-05 In peer review
...To be continued

采蘑 2023-03-07

Three reviewers asked detailed and insightful questions. The response letter was over 10,000 words long. PCCP requires the inclusion of expressions with a physical chemistry understanding in the paper, not just an expression of material functionality.

cs11 2023-02-20

It is indeed a well-established journal. We submitted the manuscript on November 3rd, transferring from Nanoscale. The review process took slightly longer due to the holiday periods in both foreign and domestic countries. There were three reviewers, including a knowledgeable expert in the field. The reviews were conducted rigorously, and after two rounds of revisions, we received many constructive suggestions that greatly improved the paper. We hope the journal continues to thrive and improve!

DK不吃榴莲 2023-02-10

Posted on October 5th, 2022
Received on November 28th, 2022

accu 2023-01-06

6.15 - Conducted submission
8.17 - One reviewer accepted minor revisions directly, while another reviewer rejected
8.21 - Sent to another reviewer. I worked on pure theory, but this reviewer focused on pure experimentation. PCCP is really emphasizing experiments more and more now. However, overall, the quality of the questions asked was very high. It was very worth answering.
8.28 - One major revision and one minor revision, with a very short amount of time given, as soon as possible.
9.11 - Submitted revisions according to the reviewers' comments
9.25 - Accepted

小阳子 2023-01-04

Brother, how's it going? Mine is also very slow.

兮渺 2022-12-06

"Transferred from Dalton to PCCP. Submitted on November 11, 2022, and approximately one week later in peer review. It is still in peer review now, and I don't know how much longer I have to wait."

zhangzhenhua 2022-11-29

Originally in the field of physics, I submitted to a chemistry journal for the first time. It was reviewed on the same day and received a response in 12 days. It was accepted within a month, showing high efficiency.

阿宗 2022-11-17

Hello, may I ask if the order of authors is correct in the publication license interface of PCCP after receiving your article? On my publication license interface, the corresponding author is automatically placed first, and then the order of other authors is completely reversed from top to bottom. I have sent an email asking about this but have not received a reply yet.

阿宗 2022-11-16

Posted on August 26th, received first review response on October 19th. Two green lights and one red light, the editor suggested resubmission.

Resubmitted on November 4th, received second review response on November 9th, with minor revisions suggested.

Submitted the minor revisions on November 11th, and they were accepted on November 16th.

PCCP is now paying more attention to experimental results. It is advised to be cautious when submitting pure computational/simulation research to PCCP.

Even though the research type selected during submission was computational/simulation, the reviewer still focused on experimental aspects and directly recommended rejection. The reviewer's feedback included: 1. Lack of research motivation; 2. Why not compare multiple materials; 3. Lack of experimental data.

As a result, an additional section was added to emphasize the novelty of the results in response to the first review. The response letter addressed these concerns with over 1500 words. However, the second reviewer asked similar questions about materials and experiments, which was a bit frustrating. Thankfully, minor revisions were requested.

Another detailed response of over 1000 words was provided. Finally, the stubborn reviewer was convinced, and the paper was successfully accepted.

HeISeTH 2022-11-04

Boss, is your article purely simulated by calculation?

zzhlethub 2022-10-11

This article was rejected by JMCA, CEJ, and EEM, but after carefully revising it from start to finish, it was submitted to PCCP.

zzhlethub 2022-10-11

Submitted on 15-Sep
In peer review on 20-Sep
Accepted on 10-Oct

Five days after submission, it entered peer review. Twenty days later, the editor accepted it. Both reviewers recommended direct acceptance.

加油！！ 2022-09-21

Submitted for review~ There were several changes in the peer review and with the editor directly.

muzi1219 2022-09-17

Did you submit it for review?

加油！！ 2022-08-30

2022.8.23 In peer review
2022.8.26 With editor
2022.8.30 With editor

Translation:

2022.8.23 In peer review
2022.8.26 With editor
2022.8.30 With editor

小城市 2022-08-26

The difference in impact factor between PCCP and JMCC is quite significant. PCCP is classified as TOP in the upgraded ranking system, while JMCC is not. Which one is more suitable for investment?

加油！！ 2022-08-18

The second submission to PCCP, the previous one was very fast, but for some reason, this one is incredibly slow. Submitted on July 25th, received with editor on August 5th, and still with editor on August 18th. This submission is a transfer.