认证评论 - PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

煤系气 2023-06-13

It took 13 months, and after a major overhaul, I got hired! I'm happy!

海底岩浆 2023-05-15

Not OA, no charges.

yyni 2023-03-17

I submitted it in January of last year and it has been five months since the third review, but there is still no result.

yyni 2023-03-17

Slow, really slow, and it's also damn annoying.

煤系气 2023-03-12

After six months of initial review, the manuscript was reviewed at the beginning of November 22 and revised within a week. However, it took another month to make additional revisions due to word count issues. Since early December, the manuscript has been with the editor, and there has been an ongoing dispute regarding the institutional email of one of the authors. I have already replied to two emails regarding the institutional email issue, explaining that this author's organization does not have an institutional email. It has been three months since the manuscript has been with the editor, and the status has not changed. When I inquire about the progress, I am only informed that the manuscript is still with the editor and no further information can be provided. It is exhausting.

wilma 2023-03-09

Is PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY an open access journal?

人间四月天728 2023-02-14

What happened, brother? Can you explain it in detail?

yyni 2023-02-13

"What a fucking trash journal, really don't submit, it kills people."

墨余君 2023-01-23

Hello, have you ever encountered the situation of "Server responded with 0 code" when uploading files?

微笑312 2022-09-09

Hello, may I ask how long did you wait for external review after submitting the revised draft? Have you been accepted now?

微笑312 2022-08-28

Hello, may I ask if the peer reviewers will still receive the manuscript during the second round of editing, or will the editor make the decision directly?

YZHYZH 2022-08-26

The second submission has been sent for almost a month, but there has been no proof since it was received. It has been over 40 days since the acceptance was received.

微笑312 2022-08-24

Hello, may I ask how long after you returned the item did you undergo the second review? I have already submitted the item for repair for over two months, and it is still in the hands of the editor without being reviewed.

于志豪 2022-08-21

Hello everyone, I would like to ask how long did it take for you to receive the proofreading email after your Awaiting Production Checklist status? Mine has been ongoing for over a month.

sy2021 2022-03-22

9.29 Submitted
10.1 with editor
10.8 out for review
11.17 decision pending
11.17 revision required
11.24 Revised Manuscript Submitted
11.26 With Journal Administrator
11.30 with editor
12.13 out for review
1.1 decision pending
1.30 revision required
2.1 Revised Manuscript Submitted
2.2 With Journal Administrator
2.4 with editor
3.2 out for review
3.2 decision pending
3.21 accepted
It took almost half a year to be accepted, so please do not submit if you are in a hurry. Students in their second or third year of graduate school can submit. The formatting requirements are not high, but the article should have some innovative points.

xiaoyan fux 2022-03-04

Submitted on October 1st, 2021. Revised the format and resubmitted on the 6th. Reviewed by two reviewers on the 26th, and an additional reviewer was added. First review returned on November 3rd. Made revisions and submitted on the 6th. It took a month for the resubmission to be reviewed. Minor revisions completed on December 8th. Finally accepted on January 10th of this year. Less than a month online. Overall, it took a little over four months. The reviewer's comments were helpful for improvement.

海底岩浆 2022-02-20

Excuse me, OP, how long have you been in the Out for Review stage? I have been in this stage for a very long time now..

lipupc@163.com 2022-02-08

From submission to acceptance, it took one and a half years (18 months). The efficiency of the journal is too low, so be cautious when submitting.
25 Jul 2020: Manuscript submitted
12 Jul 2021: Major Revision
13 Sep 2021: Revised manuscript submitted
15 Jan 2022: Accepted
27 Jan 2022: Proofs for review
8 Feb 2022: Published online

海底岩浆 2022-01-17

So slow, the official website says the average decision takes 60 days. It has been over 2 months for me and still no progress, very slow, still under review...

JF0913 2021-12-09

Don't worry, there is still a long wait after being hired. It has been a month since I was hired, and the proofreading hasn't been done yet.

低调的西川 2021-11-22

Posted in April 2021, returned for major revisions in October, and no news since the revision on October 25th. Seeing the status "with Editor," it feels like going through the first round of review process again, which is exhausting.

guowanjiang 2021-09-07

19 May 2021: Manuscript Submitted
25 May 2021: with editor
30 June 2021: out for review
21 July 2021: Decision Pending
07 August 2021: Revised Manuscript Submitted
12 August 2021: With Editor
14 August 2021: Out for Review
03 September 2021: Decision Pending
07 September 2021: Accepted

Translation:
19 May 2021: Manuscript Submitted
25 May 2021: with editor
30 June 2021: out for review
21 July 2021: Decision Pending
07 August 2021: Revised Manuscript Submitted
12 August 2021: With Editor
14 August 2021: Out for Review
03 September 2021: Decision Pending
07 September 2021: Accepted

guowanjiang 2021-09-06

The date of the decision pending for the first review and return for repair has been changed. It has been almost a week without any news. Is it a good thing or a bad thing?

aloha2021 2021-08-19

There is a reason why this journal is terrible. It is incredibly slow, and the key problem is that the editors are idiots. I have been waiting for half a year for the revisions to be done, and it is still "under review". I have sent multiple emails to communicate, but they keep telling me to wait. Is it so difficult to find another reviewer? Originally, I was supposed to publish this in collaboration with the first party. The project has already been completed, but the task is not yet finished. This journal is so terrible that I strongly advise against submitting to it. Let it go to waste, everyone.

scieixy 2021-07-08

It has been 5 months since the submission. Initially, there were inquiries and replies, but now there is no response at all.

石油打工人 2021-05-21

Translate the following text into English:

2020.7.01 - Submitted a review article. The next day, it was under review.
Waited for a long time and sent three reminders. The response was quick, saying that it was being reviewed, but waiting was difficult.
2021.4.08 - Major revisions requested. Only one reviewer, asked to provide additional tables and the latest literature.
2021.4.20 - Revisions submitted.
2021.5.10 - Minor revisions requested. The reviewer for the major revisions confirmed that the issues were resolved and said it could be published. However, a second reviewer was added and recommended publication, asking for two more references to be added.
2021.5.14 - Revisions submitted. Under review within an hour.
Currently waiting for the results.

scieixy 2021-05-13

The review process is too slow. Are there any requests for withdrawal? How long does it take to withdraw?

scieixy 2021-05-09

The review process is slow, but the editor's attitude is good!

永恒_QD 2021-05-04

It has been 12 months since submission, and it is still under review. Speechless!

20180018 2021-04-15

It has been over 14 months, and it is still under review. It's really speechless. I have reminded them 4-5 times, and their response is pretty quick, but the reasons they give are absurd. They say that the reviewers for this journal are all experts and they review articles for free, and there are many submissions... In short, they seem to be really impressive, even more so than top-tier journals.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started