abba 2023-08-08

投jmca，建议转投sus.mat，不保证送审；投cej，建议转jcis。
尝试nano.res：
一投杯具，编辑觉得重复率高，自查为14；
头铁二投，表征方法扔附件，外审3周，大修给了20天；
返修提交，5天录用。
发文量很高，很喜欢他的排版，希望期刊越办越好吧。

Translation:
Submit to jmca, recommend transferring to sus.mat, no guarantee of review; submit to cej, recommend transferring to jcis.
Try nano.res:
First submission encountered a mishap, editor perceived high duplication rate, self-check revealed 14;
Second submission with a stubborn attitude, indicating method by attaching files, external review took 3 weeks, major revisions were given 20 days;
Revised submission was accepted in 5 days.
The publication output is very high, and I really like their formatting. I hope the journal continues to improve.

Chem-Su 2023-08-02

What situation results in a rejected invitation to contribute an article? This is the first time I have heard of such a thing.

Murphy615 2023-08-01

Too abstract, the manuscript was rejected without being reviewed, and it confused our teachers. Later, the teacher asked one of her fellow students, but his manuscript was also rejected. It can only be said that it was too abstract. The rejection came quickly, as it was submitted on the 28th and rejected on the evening of the 1st.

让我发个大子刊吧 2023-07-20

The previous submission to AEM for review was rejected. I am anxious to publish. I submitted it on June 28th and sent it for review on July 3rd. It has been over half a month now. I am hoping for some good suggestions.

召唤师10359 2023-07-13

2022.08.23 submitted
2022.08.23 with editor
2022.08.25 under review
2022.09.20 major revision
2022.09.27 revision submitted
2022.10.12 accept
2022.12.31 published online

The publication process is a bit slow, but the peer review is very fast and efficient.

张同学快去做实验呀 2023-06-24

First submission to a domestic journal, sharing the submission process with everyone.
20230419 Submitted to Journal
20230420 With Editor
20230422 Under Review
20230510 Major Revision
20230523 Revision Submitted to Journal
20230523 With Editor
20230524 Under Review
20230618 Minor Revision
20230620 Revision Submitted to Journal
20230620 With Editor
20230622 Accept

The whole process was still very fast, thanks to Professor Hailiang Wang from Yale University for editing, and thanks to the reviewers.
As a leading domestic journal, we hope Nano Research will continue to improve.

以利沙 2023-05-25

The first time writing a review, thank God for His favor. It was published smoothly.
Submitted on April 14th,
Revised on May 12th,
Submitted on May 24th,
Accepted on May 25th.
The editing process was very fast, I hope the journal continues to improve.

喔喔 2023-05-25

How long does everyone usually take to proofread?

怪咖 2023-04-16

After reviewing the articles in this journal, I feel that they are of poor quality (the one I reviewed was particularly bad, the editor kept requesting revisions). Then I submitted my own article, which took more than ten days, and they rejected it directly, claiming there were too many submissions (it seems like they didn't even read the content of the article). It's probably a clique journal, I realized it after submitting my own article, and personally, I think it's quite unfair. Most of the articles published are from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, so think carefully before submitting.

222很尴尬 2023-03-06

Yes, I submitted to Nature and got rejected, so I am directly submitting to Nano Research.

罗辑666666 2023-02-17

I received an email with the proof.

科研狗0 2023-02-15

Did you prove it?

花柳朵 2023-02-12

Domestic journals are of low quality. In order to promote development, they are easily accepted due to low entry requirements. This is evident in the academic research community.

罗辑666666 2023-02-06

Just received a few days ago, waited almost a week and still no proof. It's too slow.

科研狗0 2023-02-06

How long did you receive it? I heard it's very slow.

会务科 2023-02-06

How long does it take for you to proofread after receiving it? It feels so slow.

jqxky 2023-02-06

Translation: Submitted on 20221222, reviewed in two days. Revised on 20230104, three reviewers provided comments similar to minor revisions, and the editor suggested major revisions. During the Chinese New Year, I returned on 20230128. Accepted on 20230205. The submission process was smooth, with a small research team. The first review took ten days, and the second review took five days. The efficiency felt very high. Thanks to editor Xun Wang and the reviewers.

BCN没完了 2023-01-31

Hey, it's been 10 days and my condition hasn't changed yet. I've been with the editor all this time.

科研狗0 2023-01-30

There are a total of three reviewers.

科研狗0 2023-01-30

2022 12 20 submit - Submitted on December 20, 2022
2022 12 21 with editor - Under review with the editor on December 21, 2022
2022 12 22 under review - Under review on December 22, 2022
2023 01 06 required review complete - Required review completed on January 6, 2023
2023 01 09 minor revision - Minor revision required on January 9, 2023
2023 01 14 resubmit - Resubmitted on January 14, 2023
2023 01 16 under review - Under review on January 16, 2023
中途放假到初八 - On vacation until the eighth day
2023 01 30 accept - Accepted on January 30, 2023
速度很快，审稿意见也很专业，希望Nano Research越办越好 - The speed is fast, and the review comments are also professional. I hope Nano Research will continue to improve.

fang2022 2023-01-15

1.10 Revision submitted
1.13 accepted

花柳朵 2023-01-06

Journals that rely on personal connections, everyone should be cautious when submitting, as it is a waste of time.

花柳朵 2023-01-06

Very easy to be hired, low threshold, and low difficulty.

啥啥你说啥 2023-01-05

Hello OP~~ May I ask if, after receiving this editing notice, I can simply wait for the proof notification? How long does it usually take to receive the proof notification, and how long does it typically take to publish after proofing in normal circumstances? Thank you, OP~

王不冷 2022-12-23

20221003--submission
20221103--Received reviewer comments, major and minor revisions required. Editor is Professor Peng Xiaogang, given one month for revisions.
20221202--Revised manuscript submitted.
20221216--Both reviewers approved, sent for typesetting (although the initial draft was already typeset, this is likely an automated response).
20221219--Resubmitted after typesetting.
20221222--accept

Efficient journal, both reviewers are experts in the field and provided constructive comments. Thank you to Professor Peng Xiaogang and best wishes for the continued success of Nano Research!

fang2022 2022-12-16

12.16 Minor Revision
Two reviewers, thank you Professor Peng Xiaogang.

fang2022 2022-12-13

10.14 submitted
10.22 under review
It has been nearly two months since submission and there is still no result. It has wasted everyone's time. Without connections, I do not recommend submitting.

难彦之情 2022-12-13

Yes, according to the journal's requirements, revisions were made using the template.

ly 2022-12-06

Hello, may I ask if I need to modify and return it according to the journal template after receiving it?

ly 2022-12-06

Hello, may I ask if I need to modify and return it according to the journal template after receiving it?