路程遥远 2023-06-15

2023.3.13 Submission
2023.5.5 Major revision. Three reviewers provided 19 comments (the first reviewer requested additional content, while the others had minor issues). Thus, it took a bit more time.
2023.5.23 Resubmission
2023.6.1 Receiving comments (minor issues)
2023.6.5 Revised
2023.6.13 Accepted
Overall, the review process was fast, and all three reviewers were very professional. Their questions were beneficial in improving the quality of the article. Best wishes for the continued success of MSMSE!

SCI 不分区 2023-06-06

2023-3-23 Submission

2023-6-6 Two reviewers have returned their review results, one positive and one moderate. The decision made by the editor is that the article is not suitable for publication in this journal and has recommended me to transfer it to PS (also under IOP, so all the review comments have been transferred there). PS has a higher impact factor and is not open access. Now, I will wait patiently for the results.

(MSME has a low publication rate per year, making it difficult to find reviewers, and the review process is relatively slow.)

进。 2023-02-03

2022.7.16 Submission
2022.9.12 Revision
2022.10.01 Acceptance
2022.10.25 Publication

This is my first research paper, and I feel that this journal has a fast review process and does not have very high requirements for innovation. I was lucky that the journal upgraded to a Tier 3 after my paper was accepted. I wish the journal continued to improve and succeed!

sciyu 2022-04-25

Research rookie, submitted on February 10th, received feedback from three reviewers on April 11th. The first and third reviewers agreed to accept it, while the second reviewer provided 11 suggestions, all minor issues. After making revisions on April 19th, it was resubmitted and on April 22nd, received an acceptance notification. This journal is classified as a third-tier publication in the JCR, with an impact factor of 2.439. This is my first SCI paper, and I am extremely happy. I will continue to work hard and express my gratitude to the editors and reviewers for their hard work. I wish the journal continued success and an increasing impact factor!

jingjing_wei@163.com 2021-08-05

4.8 Submission;
Feedback received on 5.1, one reviewer suggested minor revisions, another reviewer suggested major revisions, and the editor suggested major revisions;
Revised manuscript returned after one month;
Feedback received again after about ten days, the same reviewer suggested major revisions, but with fewer comments;
Revised manuscript returned after 10 days;
10 days later, the manuscript was provisionally accepted.
Overall, the process was fast, with two professional reviewers, and a user-friendly submission page.